Would Ron Paul be the Republican presidential nominee if he had won Iowa?

[kenyanobama]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

The Good Dr. Ronald E. Paul is the farthest thing from a "baby killer". He has an incredibly pro-life voting record. Moreso than Romney, as I'm sure you know. What, in your mind, could possibly make him a "baby killer"?

Babies died while their mothers were under RongPaul's care. Instead of staying up to date in medicine he spent his time studying economics, history, and his version of the Constitution. Instead of upholding his oath and providing the best care possible for his patients he was off chasing his own little dream. Ron Paul would rather learn to be a good Muslim, or learn Chinese, than commit troops to a conflict or prepare this nation for a war.

He is a coward, a wimp, a liar. He let babies die while he learned about economics.

And pray tell where did you hear this about Dr. Paul?

The Hannity Forums, why?

[Phony Moderate]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

The Good Dr. Ronald E. Paul is the farthest thing from a "baby killer". He has an incredibly pro-life voting record. Moreso than Romney, as I'm sure you know. What, in your mind, could possibly make him a "baby killer"?

Babies died while their mothers were under RongPaul's care. Instead of staying up to date in medicine he spent his time studying economics, history, and his version of the Constitution. Instead of upholding his oath and providing the best care possible for his patients he was off chasing his own little dream. Ron Paul would rather learn to be a good Muslim, or learn Chinese, than commit troops to a conflict or prepare this nation for a war.

He is a coward, a wimp, a liar. He let babies die while he learned about economics.

And pray tell where did you hear this about Dr. Paul?

The Hannity Forums, why?

Ah, so you are a sock.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

The Good Dr. Ronald E. Paul is the farthest thing from a "baby killer". He has an incredibly pro-life voting record. Moreso than Romney, as I'm sure you know. What, in your mind, could possibly make him a "baby killer"?

Babies died while their mothers were under RongPaul's care. Instead of staying up to date in medicine he spent his time studying economics, history, and his version of the Constitution. Instead of upholding his oath and providing the best care possible for his patients he was off chasing his own little dream. Ron Paul would rather learn to be a good Muslim, or learn Chinese, than commit troops to a conflict or prepare this nation for a war.

He is a coward, a wimp, a liar. He let babies die while he learned about economics.

And pray tell where did you hear this about Dr. Paul?

The Hannity Forums, why?

And do they mean he literally was reading an economics book while a baby was right in front of him and needed him? What exactly was stated? The good Dr. Paul is a man of exquisite moral tastes and I wouldn't expect to ever hear something like this about him.

[BritishDixie]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

The Good Dr. Ronald E. Paul is the farthest thing from a "baby killer". He has an incredibly pro-life voting record. Moreso than Romney, as I'm sure you know. What, in your mind, could possibly make him a "baby killer"?

Babies died while their mothers were under RongPaul's care. Instead of staying up to date in medicine he spent his time studying economics, history, and his version of the Constitution. Instead of upholding his oath and providing the best care possible for his patients he was off chasing his own little dream. Ron Paul would rather learn to be a good Muslim, or learn Chinese, than commit troops to a conflict or prepare this nation for a war.

He is a coward, a wimp, a liar. He let babies die while he learned about economics.

I don't like Paul's foreign policy either, but this goes too far.

[kenyanobama]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

The Good Dr. Ronald E. Paul is the farthest thing from a "baby killer". He has an incredibly pro-life voting record. Moreso than Romney, as I'm sure you know. What, in your mind, could possibly make him a "baby killer"?

Babies died while their mothers were under RongPaul's care. Instead of staying up to date in medicine he spent his time studying economics, history, and his version of the Constitution. Instead of upholding his oath and providing the best care possible for his patients he was off chasing his own little dream. Ron Paul would rather learn to be a good Muslim, or learn Chinese, than commit troops to a conflict or prepare this nation for a war.

He is a coward, a wimp, a liar. He let babies die while he learned about economics.

I don't like Paul's foreign policy either, but this goes too far.

No, Ron Paul reneged on his doctor's oath to become a politician. He contributed to the world-wide shortage of doctors and is responsible for the death of millions.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

You know he still practices as a doctor, right? And unless he headed some sort of mass genocide, it's kinda hard to be responsible for the deaths of millions.

[Donerail]

No, Republicans wouldn't have voted for a baby killer.

The Good Dr. Ronald E. Paul is the farthest thing from a "baby killer". He has an incredibly pro-life voting record. Moreso than Romney, as I'm sure you know. What, in your mind, could possibly make him a "baby killer"?

Babies died while their mothers were under RongPaul's care. Instead of staying up to date in medicine he spent his time studying economics, history, and his version of the Constitution. Instead of upholding his oath and providing the best care possible for his patients he was off chasing his own little dream. Ron Paul would rather learn to be a good Muslim, or learn Chinese, than commit troops to a conflict or prepare this nation for a war.

He is a coward, a wimp, a liar. He let babies die while he learned about economics.

I don't like Paul's foreign policy either, but this goes too far.

No, Ron Paul reneged on his doctor's oath to become a politician. He contributed to the world-wide shortage of doctors and is responsible for the death of millions.

BREAKING NEWS
US Representative and Presidential candidate Ron Paul is responsible for a mass genocide of millions! He did something else besides work as a doctor!

[they don't love you like i love you]

LOL Cathcon is arguing with a troll/possible sock.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Whoever Kenyaobama is, I commend them. They are the best troll/sock ever. Puts CaDan to shame

[© tweed]

no, they never would have let him win no matter what happened.  but we would likely be sitting here without a presumptive nominee.

[TheGlobalizer]

I'll say yes.  I think it would have legitimized his campaign somewhat - he would have probably won NH, too.

Plenty of opportunity to fall down in the bright lights, but I think the socon skeptics would have come around enough to give him the push to victory.

[TheGlobalizer]

And I just read the rest of the thread, and loled.  Awesome.

The Atlas Forum...the Atlas Forum never changes.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

BRTD - you're arguing that a 20 percent reduction in government spending results in a 2 percent reduction in private sector employment?

[Niemeyerite]

1) Don't ban kenyanobama. My afternoons are funnier reading his posts.
2) I can study Medicine if I want (I got the mark needed), but I'll study Law & Business Management instead. I'm a baby killer, but I don't care. In fact, I'm glad I won't work as a doctor. What a HP I am.