historical reasons for each state's growth cycles (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:40:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  historical reasons for each state's growth cycles (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: historical reasons for each state's growth cycles  (Read 1255 times)
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« on: July 02, 2012, 04:04:36 PM »
Quote from: freepcrusher on July 02, 2012, 02:38:54 PM
Minnesota
Best Decade: 1930s (+0.12 Seats)
Reason: IDK

I suspect Minnesota weathered (hah) the 1930s fairly well thanks to its northern location, so that's probably the result of migrants from Great Plains states.  I know it seems like half my Iowan relatives moved to Minnesota sometime around the 1930s.  The state government sometimes being avowedly socialist probably made it attractive to poor farmers Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 13 queries.