historical reasons for each state's growth cycles (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:11:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  historical reasons for each state's growth cycles (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: historical reasons for each state's growth cycles  (Read 1259 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: July 02, 2012, 08:36:39 PM »

Florida
Best Decade: 1970s (+4.20 Seats)
Reason: IDK
Worst Decade: 1910s (+0.43 Seats)
Reason: Maybe the state was seen as a backwater back then

Georgia
Best Decade: 1990s (+1.32 Seats)
Reason: The state at the time was seen as some kind of fundie zion
Worst Decade: 1920s (-1.58 seats)
Reason: IDK

Mississippi
Best Decade: 1970s (+0.10 Seats)
Reason: IDK
Worst Decade: 1910s (-1.13 Seats)
Reason: IDK

South Carolina
Best Decade: 1970s (+0.46 Seats)
Reason: IDK
Worst Decade: 1920s (-0.75 Seats)
Reason: IDK

Virginia
Best Decade: 1940s (+0.77 Seats)
Reason: boom in wartime industries?
Worst Decade: 1920s (-0.90 Seats)
Reason: IDK

Not certain about Virgina, but in the other four states, the reason why those were their worst decades was certainly because of the boll weevil.

The boll weevil crossed the Rio Grande into Texas in the 1890s and spread.  It devastated the cotton fields, killing off sharecropping as it killed the cotton, and was one of the principal causes of the Great Migration of Negroes from the rural south to the urban north.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.