Romney's being "out of touch" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:01:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Romney's being "out of touch" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Romney's being "out of touch"  (Read 1777 times)
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


« on: July 05, 2012, 12:11:48 PM »

The media and others are often talking about Romney's lack of favorability, and his being "out of touch" with "regular people".

Indeed, the Obama campaign is trying to use a well documented Capitalistic background to condemn a candidate.

My question is, does a candidates wealth really matter that much? I mean, if I or anybody I know got a job at a business like Bain Capitol, my family...their family...would all be doing backflips. I can imagine the reaction:

"So and So got a job at Bain Capitol...salary...new office...ect".

"Regular" Americans would be throwing them a party congratulating them on their success. Who would criticize getting a high-paying job and being successful? I don't think I've ever met anybody who would respond negatively to the news of someone getting a job, whether it's minimum wage or high salary. But since the person who did it is now a candidate for President....you attack it?

George H.W. Bush was rich before becoming President. So was Reagan, so was Kennedy. So was Clinton, Dubya and Obama. What's the problem? Isn't Obama just as out of touch?

Seriously? How many Americans are worth $200 million? How many worked for corporations like Bain Capitol? Fair enough. But...how many were lawyers? How many wrote books? It's all the same, Obama and Romney. If you're gonna call one out of touch, say the same for the other.
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2012, 01:49:05 PM »

Americans have no problem voting for super rich, aristocratic politicians. In fact, most Presidents have been from that background. We all talk a big game about how we want a regular Joe as President but we rarely elect someone who is truly regular or working class.

That being said, if they are unbelievably rich or well bred, then we at least expect them to have some semblance of normalcy and relatability. Dubya may have been super wealthy but he appeared to be down to earth. He was also more open about his previous struggles like his DUI and drinking problem. All of it made him seem more relatable.

The problem with Romney is not his wealth, upbringing, or business experience, it's more his personality. I haven't witnessed one genuine, human moment from Romney. Every attempt at normalcy seems elaborately choreographed and insincere.

Other people notice it too, which makes Obama's Bain attacks more effective. He acts cold and unfeeling so it's more believable that he also acted that way at Bain.

Unfortunately that's business. From what I've heard Romney sounds like a perfectly decent man.

Yes, you're right, that's business. But name the last time Americans wanted a cold, unfeeling corporate guy to be their president?

Isn't Obama just as cold and unfeeling, though? Seriously....he's just as much a bore.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.