Indiana (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:11:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Indiana (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Indiana  (Read 2601 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


« on: July 23, 2012, 01:37:06 PM »

I'd be shocked if the state ends within 7-8 points this year.  It will almost certainly swing back to the R column, which is likely why no one is polling it.

Its strange though that a state can swing 20 points between elections, and then swing back by almost the same amount the next. I'm sure some of the swing was because of the hopey-changey stuff, but equally there are surely some underlying demographic changes meaning Indiana will stay close regardless

Indiana has long been the Republican anomaly in Presidential elections. It is more rural than neighbors and near-neighbors Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin. It has generally low voter turnout (the state shuts down its voting booths at 6 PM)... but it can vote for Democrats for the Senate and the Governorship. In the 111th Congress it had a 5-4 split in favor of  Democrats in the House delegation.

The state is difficult to campaign in from afar; such usually favors the Republican nominee for President. By campaigning from Chicago, President Obama turned that upside-down. The bad economy hurt Republicans due to the RV industry sensitive to the general economy, gas prices, and financing. Two states bordering Indiana (Michigan and Ohio) were swing states throughout most of 2008. To reach some parts of Michigan and Ohio the Obama campaign had to buy ads in South Bend and Fort Wayne. As Michigan became a sure thing the ads stayed on in South Bend... and voters in eastern Indiana were still getting ads from Cincinnati, Dayton, and Fort Wayne. As Michigan became a sure thing the Obama campaign could shift advertising to Indianapolis from Grand Rapids, Lansing, Flint, and Detroit.   
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2012, 02:28:17 PM »

"Right-to-work" laws are effectively "duty-to-undercut-other-worker" laws. Right-to-work states are nightmares for working people who have lower pay, employees less likely to have medical coverage, more deaths on the job, lower credit scores, lower educational achievement, and more high-school dropouts. They are poorer. The only compensation is that duty-to-undercut states have lower costs of living... which may reflect the higher real-estate costs in such states as Hawaii, California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, and Maryland. There may be more jobs but they are lower-paying, dead-end jobs.

What's the dream of the Hard Rigtht -- that higher profits and executive compensation allow more people to work as domestic servants? 

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.