Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
Posts: 8,344
|
|
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2012, 01:22:18 PM » |
|
|
« Edited: August 03, 2012, 02:05:35 PM by Dressage Voter »
|
while a parody the analogy is apt.
Science shows that California is more in danger of experiencing earthquakes than Iowa, and science indicates that more Earthquakes will come based on analyzing historical trends. Therefore California's government has put in many regulations and limits on where and how things are constructed in the state. These regulations increase costs and decrease certain economic opportunities.
NC is essentially doing the opposite. The USGS and entire world of science is telling NC that they are susceptible to future sea level rising. This finding would therefore therefore force the state to take actions which would cost money and/or opportunity. Instead of dealing with the problem they are choosing to ignore it (or redefine it as not a problem)
Global warming denial has such a great allure because it is the easier thing to do. If we say it isn't happening then we dont have to deal with it.
|