Which scenario is more likely?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 05:04:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Which scenario is more likely?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Scenario A
 
#2
Scenario B
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 21

Author Topic: Which scenario is more likely?  (Read 1111 times)
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,252
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 09, 2012, 05:14:48 PM »
« edited: August 09, 2012, 05:17:27 PM by Senator Scott »

Scenario A: Arkansas electing a pro-choice, pro-marijuana governor who actively fights for LGBT causes in his state

Scenario B: Massachusetts electing a pro-life, staunchly anti-gun control governor who actively fights for a constitutional ban on gay marriage in his state

Lean scenario B.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2012, 05:54:10 PM »
« Edited: August 11, 2012, 07:07:18 PM by JulioMadrid »

Both of them are more likely than Alabama electing a black... but, still, I think A is more likely. Romney could be elected again there in 2014 or 2018 if he doesn't win this election, but it's higly unlikely.

EDIT: When I said A, I was referring to B...
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2012, 06:26:01 PM »

In a battle of two near impossible scenario's, I must go with B.
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,535
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2012, 07:00:57 PM »

I would say A, if Democrats continue to have a local/statewide apparatus and run a successful candidate for governor who campaigns as a moderate but governs .... radically for Arkansas.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2012, 07:35:28 PM »

Scenario B: Massachusetts electing a pro-life, staunchly anti-gun control governor who actively fights for a constitutional ban on gay marriage in his state

Done! Cheesy



Oh wait, that's a description of him now.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,252
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2012, 08:21:01 PM »
« Edited: August 09, 2012, 08:28:17 PM by Senator Scott »

Supposedly, it's all about style and not about substance in politics these days, so maybe someday either of those states could elect people like that if the candidates are better at connecting with the voters than their opponents.  I doubt something like that will happen any time soon, though.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2012, 09:29:05 AM »

Probably A. Had you said a different Southern state besides VA, MO, NC, GA, FL, or TX, I'd have said B.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 14 queries.