2012 ballot measures

[Holmes]

Also it's not a statewide measure, but lol: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Los_Angeles_Porn_Actors_Required_to_Wear_Condoms_Act_%28November_2012%29

I hope that's a "lol" in support because it's pretty sad to still see bareback porn in 2012.

[Holmes]

It's not just about consenting adults going at it without condoms, this is their livelihood and their life. They have sex with so many people, and all it takes is one person to lie about not having an STD to infect many.

[Holmes]

30: Yes
31: No
32: No
33: No
34: Yes
35: Yes
36: Yes
37: No
38: Yes
39: Yes
40: Yes

[Holmes]

So apparently my ballot (Los Angeles) has something called Question B, which asks if it should be mandatory for performers in adult films to wear condoms.

Surely you're voting yes?

[Holmes]

I'm with Holmes. Wearing condoms is a workplace safety issue. 

And as Mr. Moderate said, if the workplace moves, what difference does it make besides lost revenue for the city of Los Angeles?

WTF man. Why bother having any regulations at all, if you are worried about companies going out of state.

^^ this.

So it's ok to regulate sectors and workplaces that don't affect you personally, but if it's the porn you watch...

[Holmes]

Apart from death penalty and GMO labeling (f**king agrobusiness moneybomb), everything went well in California.

The genetically modified labeling proposition was frivolous. I'm glad it failed. Here's a fun fact, the vast majority of food you eat is genetically modified, and if it's not, it's probably stated in some way or another on the package. And genetic modification is not a bad thing for many reasons, including increase in food size and taste, increase in progeny or fertility in foreign or harmful soils.