CT,Sen: Quinnipiac - McMahon leads by 3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:35:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 Senatorial Election Polls
  CT,Sen: Quinnipiac - McMahon leads by 3
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: CT,Sen: Quinnipiac - McMahon leads by 3  (Read 2433 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 28, 2012, 06:47:52 AM »

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-and-centers/polling-institute/connecticut/release-detail?ReleaseID=1790

McMahon 49
Murphy 46


The people of Connecticut are battling against class warfare.

Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2012, 07:44:35 AM »

If CTers were all too willing to reject her in 2010, why oh why oh why would they want her now? I just don't get it.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2012, 08:38:23 AM »

This could turn out to be the sleeper race of 2012.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2012, 08:58:51 AM »

If CTers were all too willing to reject her in 2010, why oh why oh why would they want her now? I just don't get it.

Blumenthal was a popular AG while Murphy is some wacko office hopping leftie.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2012, 09:07:13 AM »

If CTers were all too willing to reject her in 2010, why oh why oh why would they want her now? I just don't get it.

Blumenthal was a popular AG while Murphy is some wacko office hopping leftie.

Golly gee! Just the way I like 'em! Sign me up.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,492
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 28, 2012, 09:07:46 AM »

And Obama is only up by 7%.

It won't last but that's still very surprising.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 28, 2012, 09:08:15 AM »

It won't even be that close in the end but I'm happy that she'll at least make the Dems spend more than they intended to in this state.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 28, 2012, 10:20:31 AM »

If CTers were all too willing to reject her in 2010, why oh why oh why would they want her now? I just don't get it.

Blumenthal was a popular AG while Murphy is some wacko office hopping leftie.

You're forgetting the problems that Blumenthal's campaign had.

I really don't understand this flirtation with McMahon, though. What appeal is there?
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 28, 2012, 12:21:23 PM »

If CTers were all too willing to reject her in 2010, why oh why oh why would they want her now? I just don't get it.

Blumenthal was a popular AG while Murphy is some wacko office hopping leftie.

You're forgetting the problems that Blumenthal's campaign had.

I really don't understand this flirtation with McMahon, though. What appeal is there?


I would guess to say that they deeply regret the self-inflicted wound known as Dan Malloy and prefer the 'trashy wrestling promoter', and that the rise of the Republican party since 2008 has helped.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 28, 2012, 01:10:48 PM »

If CTers were all too willing to reject her in 2010, why oh why oh why would they want her now? I just don't get it.

Blumenthal was a popular AG while Murphy is some wacko office hopping leftie.

You're forgetting the problems that Blumenthal's campaign had.

I really don't understand this flirtation with McMahon, though. What appeal is there?


I would guess to say that they deeply regret the self-inflicted wound known as Dan Malloy and prefer the 'trashy wrestling promoter', and that the rise of the Republican party since 2008 has helped.

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/000/554/facepalm.jpg
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 28, 2012, 01:33:10 PM »

What the f[inks] is going on in this race?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 28, 2012, 01:40:10 PM »
« Edited: August 28, 2012, 01:49:27 PM by Nathan »

If CTers were all too willing to reject her in 2010, why oh why oh why would they want her now? I just don't get it.

Blumenthal was a popular AG while Murphy is some wacko office hopping leftie.

You're forgetting the problems that Blumenthal's campaign had.

I really don't understand this flirtation with McMahon, though. What appeal is there?


I would guess to say that they deeply regret the self-inflicted wound known as Dan Malloy and prefer the 'trashy wrestling promoter', and that the rise of the Republican party since 2008 has helped.

...

...Malloy's job approval is tied in this poll, you know.

I also note that this poll has Lieberman at 50/38 approval, which, what. Looking further into this poll, none of these numbers frankly make much sense.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,828
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 28, 2012, 02:11:52 PM »

If CTers were all too willing to reject her in 2010, why oh why oh why would they want her now? I just don't get it.

Blumenthal was a popular AG while Murphy is some wacko office hopping leftie.

there is some truth to that all and McMahon is certainly a strong candidate. But to call Murphy an "office hopping leftie" is flat-out wrong. He's very much a rising star in the party and could very well be the youngest senator in 2013 if he wins.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,267
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 28, 2012, 02:17:23 PM »

If anything, I'd say that Blumenthal was a somewhat weaker candidate if only for the Vietnam controversy.  Nevertheless, McMahon will not be winning this seat.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 28, 2012, 03:12:18 PM »

Murphy is on the defensive and will be massively outspent. However the PVI wall and Obama coattails will give him a clean victory in November. McMahon is a decoy like Heather Wilson in NM.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 28, 2012, 03:13:41 PM »

What the f[inks] is going on in this race?

Nothing.
Logged
User157088589849
BlondeArtisit
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 493


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 28, 2012, 03:25:19 PM »

Jodi Rell republicans dumping the democrats moving back home.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,671
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 28, 2012, 04:19:31 PM »

To represent CT as a democrat you have to be superb in duties before attaining the office of senator. Chris Dodd had his father, Dick Blumenthal was a Vietnam vet before the macho thing came out on his service, but had the AG to help him out, and Lieberman was tough on national security. Murphy is a plain ol democrat from CT that hasn't really done that much in particular.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 28, 2012, 04:29:05 PM »

...

...Malloy's job approval is tied in this poll, you know.

I also note that this poll has Lieberman at 50/38 approval, which, what. Looking further into this poll, none of these numbers frankly make much sense.

Yes, I noticed. However, he is heavily down with independent voters that make up the bulk of the electorate and those independent voters are putting McMahon in a good place to win this seat.
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 28, 2012, 05:10:36 PM »


Haha, no. While at this point the race is definitely a tossup, Murphy is a very strong candidate and is still has a 50-50 shot at winning.
Logged
mondale84
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 28, 2012, 06:29:38 PM »

If CTers were all too willing to reject her in 2010, why oh why oh why would they want her now? I just don't get it.

Blumenthal was a popular AG while Murphy is some wacko office hopping leftie.

You're forgetting the problems that Blumenthal's campaign had.

I really don't understand this flirtation with McMahon, though. What appeal is there?

There is none, this is a troll poll.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 28, 2012, 06:46:40 PM »


Haha, no. While at this point the race is definitely a tossup, Murphy is a very strong candidate and is still has a 50-50 shot at winning.

Thats actually how krazen defines most Democrats running for Senate.

With him, the Republican candidates are usually great, patriotic people while the Democrats are often Bay Area types, wacko lefties, politicians who don't serve the will of the people, or some combination thereof.

There's quite a clear dichotomy with his descriptions.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 28, 2012, 07:18:12 PM »


So fools gold rather than the impossible suddenly becoming possible?
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 28, 2012, 07:31:05 PM »

Murphy is on the defensive and will be massively outspent. However the PVI wall and Obama coattails will give him a clean victory in November. McMahon is a decoy like Heather Wilson in NM.

People don't run for Senate in order to be decoys.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 28, 2012, 07:50:40 PM »


Haha, no. While at this point the race is definitely a tossup, Murphy is a very strong candidate and is still has a 50-50 shot at winning.

Thats actually how krazen defines most Democrats running for Senate.

With him, the Republican candidates are usually great, patriotic people while the Democrats are often Bay Area types, wacko lefties, politicians who don't serve the will of the people, or some combination thereof.

There's quite a clear dichotomy with his descriptions.

No, merely the ones who are quite clearly not performing in the polls. I would presume that a sophisticated pollwatcher like yourself would note the same.

Bob Casey for instance is clearly a man of the people.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 14 queries.