United States presidential election, 1972
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 11:13:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  United States presidential election, 1972
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Who do you support?
#1
Congressman Pete McCloskey (R-Calif.)
 
#2
Sen. Hubert Humphrey (D-Minn.)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 30

Author Topic: United States presidential election, 1972  (Read 1850 times)
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 31, 2012, 08:55:05 AM »

Three days.

Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,356
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2012, 09:11:54 AM »

McCloskey
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2012, 10:13:27 AM »

Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2012, 10:22:09 AM »

McCloskey.
Logged
後援会
koenkai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,265


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2012, 11:23:11 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Hubert Humphrey.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2012, 11:29:10 AM »

Horrific choice.

Write in: John M. Ashbrook.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2012, 11:48:57 AM »

I'll hold my nose and vote for McCloskey, but with both candidates lacking legitimacy, I was very tempted to cast a write-in.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 31, 2012, 12:17:01 PM »

FWIW, my vote goes to Humphrey.

I probably should have included John Schmitz (of the American Party) in the poll. He did get 1% of the vote IOTL, so he'd probably do better here. I might run a second one of these after this to see how a stronger Schmitz candidacy would effect the race.
Logged
Pingvin
Pingvin99
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,761
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 31, 2012, 12:35:49 PM »

Make. It. Into. A. Full. Timeline.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 31, 2012, 02:09:13 PM »

Humphrey, the only decent option.
Logged
後援会
koenkai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,265


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2012, 02:15:42 PM »

Support his exact political orientation or not, Humphrey was a good guy. He took courageous stands on issues like civil rights and opposing Communism. And he served in public office with honor and integrity. Hell, I'm pretty sure I would have voted for Humphrey in '68 as well.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 31, 2012, 02:21:50 PM »

FWIW, my vote goes to Humphrey.

I probably should have included John Schmitz (of the American Party) in the poll. He did get 1% of the vote IOTL, so he'd probably do better here. I might run a second one of these after this to see how a stronger Schmitz candidacy would effect the race.

Prediction: The Democrats get relegated to third-party status when most Humphrey supporters flock to the far-right extremist.

I can't believe I was able to post that with a straight face.
Logged
後援会
koenkai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,265


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 31, 2012, 02:24:25 PM »

FWIW, my vote goes to Humphrey.

I probably should have included John Schmitz (of the American Party) in the poll. He did get 1% of the vote IOTL, so he'd probably do better here. I might run a second one of these after this to see how a stronger Schmitz candidacy would effect the race.

Prediction: The Democrats get relegated to third-party status when most Humphrey supporters flock to the far-right extremist.

I can't believe I was able to post that with a straight face.

My vote would stay with Humphrey.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 31, 2012, 03:56:33 PM »

I want to make my position clear. I like Humphrey. I would have voted for him in '68. But in '72, given the choice between someone who failed horribly at getting elected four years previous, and an acceptable, if not ideal, alternative, I'll vote for the fresh face.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 31, 2012, 05:32:20 PM »

It's a hard choice, but I'll go with McCloskey.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 31, 2012, 05:50:28 PM »

Support his exact political orientation or not, Humphrey was a good guy. He took courageous stands on issues like civil rights and opposing Communism. And he served in public office with honor and integrity. Hell, I'm pretty sure I would have voted for Humphrey in '68 as well.

He's got my vote.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 01, 2012, 06:29:13 PM »

I want to make my position clear. I like Humphrey. I would have voted for him in '68. But in '72, given the choice between someone who failed horribly at getting elected four years previous, and an acceptable, if not ideal, alternative, I'll vote for the fresh face.

Failed horribly? Humphrey barely lost.
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 01, 2012, 06:45:59 PM »

I want to make my position clear. I like Humphrey. I would have voted for him in '68. But in '72, given the choice between someone who failed horribly at getting elected four years previous, and an acceptable, if not ideal, alternative, I'll vote for the fresh face.

Failed horribly? Humphrey barely lost.

He should have won. Okay, "horribly" may have been a bit of an overexaggeration, but Humphrey was 79 Electoral Votes (several states) short of a majority.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 01, 2012, 07:49:20 PM »


In the context of 1968, it's a miracle he didn't lose in a landslide.
Logged
後援会
koenkai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,265


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 01, 2012, 07:52:11 PM »


Basically. Considering that coming out of the sh**tstorm that was DNC 1968, he was behind practically 20 points before narrowing it to a one point margin, I say he did pretty damn well.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,435
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 02, 2012, 12:29:00 AM »


Basically. Considering that coming out of the sh**tstorm that was DNC 1968, he was behind practically 20 points before narrowing it to a one point margin, I say he did pretty damn well.

He also had no money and a threadbare organization.

The fact that he came so close in terms of popular vote has to say something positive about him. He was down by as much as 40 points early and by the end he was neck and neck with Nixon. That's a hell of a comeback.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 02, 2012, 02:22:59 PM »

Humphrey, of course.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 02, 2012, 02:25:47 PM »

McCloskey, unfortunately.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 02, 2012, 02:43:41 PM »

Humphrey, proudly, if not reluctantly.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 02, 2012, 02:48:45 PM »

After reading McCloskey's Wikipedia article, I'm glad I voted for him.  Not only did he run on an anti-war platform, but he went on to co-found the Council for the National Interest with Paul Findley.

FF
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 14 queries.