Opinion of Margaret Thatcher (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:01:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of Margaret Thatcher (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: FF or HP?
#1
FF
 
#2
HP
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 68

Author Topic: Opinion of Margaret Thatcher  (Read 5574 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« on: September 03, 2012, 06:11:51 AM »

My views on this matter are well known.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2012, 08:56:15 PM »

She was the spawn of Satan, therefore some of us don't like her much.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2012, 11:50:06 AM »

Top twenty would be stretching it, but perhaps we can get her into the top fifty. If only to annoy her more devoted fanboys.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2012, 07:21:14 AM »

What's amusing about the morally bankrupt and strikingly dishonest arguments used by a certain type of idiot right-winger to defend Pinochet is the fact that the structure is exactly the same as used to be used by a certain type of idiot left-winger to defend the Soviet Union.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2012, 06:33:59 AM »

Is this supposed to be some biting criticism? Try again, bro.

No, it was just abuse. Your argument was so craven and morally and intellectually bankrupt that it did not deserve anything other than abuse.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

No, I was pretty clearly referring to the remaining (enthusiastic and orthodox, if a caveat is needed) Western Communists after 1956.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2012, 11:24:15 AM »

Genocide is not accurate, but mass murder certainly is. And the fact that that was what he was doing was well known at the time and impossible to deny.

You should also consider educating yourself about history.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2012, 11:39:54 AM »

What's amusing about the morally bankrupt and strikingly dishonest arguments used by a certain type of idiot right-winger to defend Pinochet is the fact that the structure is exactly the same as used to be used by a certain type of idiot left-winger to defend the Soviet Union.

Except whereas the right left Chile a prosperous, free nation with fair elections (after Pinochet left), the left left Russia with mass poverty, unemployment, corruption and misery.

Actually this is exactly the sort of bullsh!t argument that Stalinist idiots used to - and the ones still around still do - use to defend their beloved USSR! Stalin, it was/is argued, successfully modernised and industrialised Russia, therefore making everything else basically alright. It is a despicable and dishonest argument, of course, as is yours.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.