OH-Rasmussen: Obama+1
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:38:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  OH-Rasmussen: Obama+1
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OH-Rasmussen: Obama+1  (Read 1556 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 13, 2012, 01:01:36 PM »

Ohio: Obama 47%, Romney 46%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/ohio/election_2012_ohio_president
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2012, 02:44:34 PM »

I personally would put Obama up by 2-3 there, but since Rassy's poll there exactly a month ago showed a tied race, I'll take this.

Anyway, entered.
Logged
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2012, 09:44:14 PM »
« Edited: September 13, 2012, 10:21:54 PM by MorningInAmerica »

The party i.d. for this likely voter sample is 36% Democrat, 34% Republican, 30% Independent (D+2). 2008 Ohio turnout per CNN exit polls was D+8. In 2004, it was R+5.

For the record, despite the new post-DNC consensus amongst most pollsters (that LV turnout in November is going to be 2008 esque), I still personally don't buy it. Scotty's sample seems perfectly reasonable to me. It's dead in the middle between 2004 and 2008 Democratic turnout in Ohio (which is just my personal hunch of what the electorate will look like in November).

Also, Obama and Romney are tied at 43% each with "other" (which is what Scotty calls Independents).
Logged
Craigo
Rookie
**
Posts: 169
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2012, 08:53:20 AM »

The party i.d. for this likely voter sample is 36% Democrat, 34% Republican, 30% Independent (D+2). 2008 Ohio turnout per CNN exit polls was D+8. In 2004, it was R+5.

For the record, despite the new post-DNC consensus amongst most pollsters (that LV turnout in November is going to be 2008 esque), I still personally don't buy it. Scotty's sample seems perfectly reasonable to me. It's dead in the middle between 2004 and 2008 Democratic turnout in Ohio (which is just my personal hunch of what the electorate will look like in November).

Also, Obama and Romney are tied at 43% each with "other" (which is what Scotty calls Independents).

Scotty? What, are you his best friend?

Have you ever even met him? I have, and I don't call him Scotty.

Plus, the usual refrain - don't waste time with party ID.
Logged
MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 779
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2012, 09:15:12 AM »
« Edited: September 14, 2012, 09:21:14 AM by MorningInAmerica »

The party i.d. for this likely voter sample is 36% Democrat, 34% Republican, 30% Independent (D+2). 2008 Ohio turnout per CNN exit polls was D+8. In 2004, it was R+5.

For the record, despite the new post-DNC consensus amongst most pollsters (that LV turnout in November is going to be 2008 esque), I still personally don't buy it. Scotty's sample seems perfectly reasonable to me. It's dead in the middle between 2004 and 2008 Democratic turnout in Ohio (which is just my personal hunch of what the electorate will look like in November).

Also, Obama and Romney are tied at 43% each with "other" (which is what Scotty calls Independents).

Scotty? What, are you his best friend?

Have you ever even met him? I have, and I don't call him Scotty (it actually seems to be a derogatory wasy of referring to him).

Plus, the usual refrain - don't waste time with party ID.

I'm far from the only person on this forum that refers to Scotty as Scotty.

Oh, the usual refrain - stop telling me what to do or what to post.

Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,836
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2012, 11:59:10 AM »

LOL, even Romney's internals show him losing by four.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2012, 12:01:28 PM »

LOL, even Romney's internals show him losing by four.

Yeah, it's a sad day for the Romney-campaign if even Scott Rasmussen can't put him ahead there.
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,478
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2012, 12:06:59 PM »

LOL, even Romney's internals show him losing by four.

it's not a romney's internals poll but a gop poll.
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2012, 11:24:16 PM »

I don't understand why Romney wanted to leak an internal poll that had him down 4 in Ohio right when Rasmussen released a poll with him only down 1. I know a lot of people on the left don't trust Rasmussen much, but they're not going to trust a Republican pollster either. He may as well have just used this poll to say Ohio is a dead heat. It seems like a strategy mistake.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 14, 2012, 11:50:28 PM »

I personally would put Obama up by 2-3 there, but since Rassy's poll there exactly a month ago showed a tied race, I'll take this.

Anyway, entered.

I actually agree, but this is probably caught part of the DNC bounce.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2012, 09:06:48 AM »

I'll take an Obama +1 lead given Romney's difficulties in Ohio.
Logged
Chaddyr23
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 479
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.19, S: -5.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2012, 12:31:12 PM »
« Edited: September 15, 2012, 12:36:05 PM by Chaddyr23 »

I don't understand why Romney wanted to leak an internal poll that had him down 4 in Ohio right when Rasmussen released a poll with him only down 1. I know a lot of people on the left don't trust Rasmussen much, but they're not going to trust a Republican pollster either. He may as well have just used this poll to say Ohio is a dead heat. It seems like a strategy mistake.
Strategic mistakes are his norm. I sound like such a hater. Either way the odds are beginning to stack against Romney however he still has quite a chance to win this in October if he can rebrand himself
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2012, 08:41:57 AM »

LOL, even Romney's internals show him losing by four.

it's not a romney's internals poll but a gop poll.

Oh, well that changes everything. Shocked
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.234 seconds with 14 queries.