2012 With Gary Johnson as a Factor
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 10:45:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  2012 With Gary Johnson as a Factor
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2012 With Gary Johnson as a Factor  (Read 880 times)
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 27, 2013, 05:33:04 PM »

2012 election. Everything happens as it did in real life, except Gary Johnson is included in all 3 presidential debates, and Jim Gray is included in the VP debate. Assume that neither Johnson nor Gray made a major gaffe, and both held their own, as average.

Assume that the Johnson/Gray ticket goes into election day polling somewhere between Ralph Nader 2000 and Ross Perot 1996 levels.

How does this effect the electoral map? Discuss with maps.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2013, 05:40:17 PM »

It would really depend, He could have gotten to about 5% nationally and up to 10% out west.  He could have actually taken votes away from Obama, and made this a tighter race.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2013, 05:42:28 PM »

I think Obama wins North Carolina, other than that, the numbers don't really change too much. If Johnson gets around 5% in this scenario that he's actually in the debates, which the polling suggests is likely, than the election numbers would be:

Barack Obama: 49.4%
Mitt Romney: 44.7%
Gary Johnson: 5.0%
Others: 0.9%

He draws a little bit more from Romney than he does Obama (about 40% Obama 60% Romney are my estimates, though I could be wrong), but the margin of win for Obama says that even without Johnson, Romney couldn't have won, so I don't think its too much of a Nader took the election deal.

And then that would allow the Libertarians on the ballot for 2016, but they probably wouldn't nominate another Johnson type again so they lose it so overall, nothing really happens.
Logged
Obamanation
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 411
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2013, 02:21:22 PM »



Obama picks up NC and GA is closer, but only the percentages change beyond that.
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2013, 05:53:28 PM »

With Gary Johnson a factor early enough for the first debate, wouldn't OFA have been able to divert resources from some of the quasi-safe states (Iowa, colorado, nevada) to some potential upsets like GA or AZ? I think so.
Logged
Undecided Voter in the Midwest
Ghost of Tilden
Rookie
**
Posts: 63
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2013, 10:31:38 PM »

With Gary Johnson a factor early enough for the first debate, wouldn't OFA have been able to divert resources from some of the quasi-safe states (Iowa, colorado, nevada) to some potential upsets like GA or AZ? I think so.

I could see Georgia flipping in that scenario... though Arizona probably wouldn't. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.209 seconds with 12 queries.