IA: Public Policy Polling: Obama increases lead to seven
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 01:14:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  IA: Public Policy Polling: Obama increases lead to seven
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IA: Public Policy Polling: Obama increases lead to seven  (Read 1075 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,776


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 26, 2012, 04:21:43 PM »
« edited: September 26, 2012, 04:33:47 PM by realisticidealist »

New Poll: Iowa President by Public Policy Polling on 2012-09-26

Summary: D: 51%, R: 44%, I: 0%, U: 5%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2012, 04:24:34 PM »

* seven.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,776


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2012, 04:34:04 PM »


I can count, really. Tongue
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2012, 04:56:10 PM »

IA should be lean dem now in RCP. That means he has 271 EVs in the bag Smiley
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2012, 05:32:34 PM »

IA should be lean dem now in RCP. That means he has 271 EVs in the bag Smiley

Keep thinking that.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2012, 05:36:19 PM »

IA should be lean dem now in RCP. That means he has 271 EVs in the bag Smiley

Nah, RCP has him at only +4.7 in Iowa: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/ia/iowa_romney_vs_obama-1922.html

It's hilarious how much of an outlier Rasmussen is in the state. Three polls with Obama up 7-8 points; one Rasmussen poll with Romney up 3 points. What a joke.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2012, 06:11:36 PM »

IA should be lean dem now in RCP. That means he has 271 EVs in the bag Smiley

Keep thinking that.

Yes, I'm too pessimistic. Obama will get more than 271 EVs. You and I know it.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2012, 06:12:49 PM »

I don't really understand why anyone doubted that Iowa would lean, at least slightly, toward Obama. For some reason there's been this weird conventional wisdom over the last year that Iowa has somehow slipped away from him but there's been practically no evidence for that outside of Rasmussen trolling.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,135
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2012, 06:19:41 PM »


Everyone knows that Romney is really up by ten. Unskewered polls show that there is a conspiracy to rig the polls in favor of Obummer.

LOL.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,307


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2012, 06:22:05 PM »

IA should be lean dem now in RCP. That means he has 271 EVs in the bag Smiley

Keep thinking that.

At this moment of time, that is the reality. Too bad you can't deal with it.

Of course we still have 2 jobs numbers and the debates to get through.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2012, 06:23:05 PM »

earlier polling in IA had shown more strength for Romney over Obama but that seems to have been reversed. I think much of this is due to Obama's ground game in the state and his better and bigger ad campaign. Let's face it IA is very white and very rural, which should help with the Republicans, but the state is also populist and Romney's country club Republicanism isn't selling well. Today's Politico has an article on how the 47% thing is even hurting Romney with white men in IA and elsewhere.
Logged
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2012, 06:44:48 PM »

I don't really understand why anyone doubted that Iowa would lean, at least slightly, toward Obama. For some reason there's been this weird conventional wisdom over the last year that Iowa has somehow slipped away from him but there's been practically no evidence for that outside of Rasmussen trolling.

It's just another effect of the popular right wing claim that Obama has lost support from white voters outside the two coasts. When you look at the polls in Iowa, Ohio and the rest of the rustbelt, it's clear now that this hasn't come to fruition. Obama may be hemorrhaging white support in states like WV, Oklahoma and Arkansas, but that was always going to happen, regardless of who was president and is in no way indicative of a larger trend among white voters nationwide.

I think Republicans would love to consolidate the white vote in the Midwest the way they did in the South, and a more blue collar Republican might have helped start the trend. But, really, you look at Obama and Romney and it's clear which one is more in touch with the average working class American- white, black or whatever.

It's just good to know that the campaign to paint Obama as "the other" hasn't worked on most white Democrats.
Logged
Mister Twister
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2012, 06:49:31 PM »

How the f*** does Obama have a better ground game in Iowa than Mitt Romney? Mitt Romney was in the damn state for 2 years for the GOP primary! WTF happened?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2012, 06:52:35 PM »

How the f*** does Obama have a better ground game in Iowa than Mitt Romney? Mitt Romney was in the damn state for 2 years for the GOP primary! WTF happened?

Packed up and left immediately after the caucus ended. Obama's Des Moines (or one of the big cities, don't remember) field headquarters is located in the same building that Romney's was before he left the state in January.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2012, 07:52:30 PM »

How the f*** does Obama have a better ground game in Iowa than Mitt Romney? Mitt Romney was in the damn state for 2 years for the GOP primary! WTF happened?

Packed up and left immediately after the caucus ended. Obama's Des Moines (or one of the big cities, don't remember) field headquarters is located in the same building that Romney's was before he left the state in January.
Romney did that in all the primary states for some reason. He had better organization than his opponents, but after every a primary ended, he'd send his staff to the next state. His Iowa staff went to New Hampshire and his New Hampshire staff went to South Carolina, and so on and so on.
Whereas after 2008s primaries and caucuses, Obama left his ground game in place for the general election and left his general election organization in place for this year.
Logged
Reds4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 789


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2012, 07:53:42 PM »

You would have thought Romney would have been smarter than that...if he ends up losing a very close election it could easily be what cost him the win.


How the f*** does Obama have a better ground game in Iowa than Mitt Romney? Mitt Romney was in the damn state for 2 years for the GOP primary! WTF happened?

Packed up and left immediately after the caucus ended. Obama's Des Moines (or one of the big cities, don't remember) field headquarters is located in the same building that Romney's was before he left the state in January.
Romney did that in all the primary states for some reason. He had better organization than his opponents, but after every a primary ended, he'd send his staff to the next state. His Iowa staff went to New Hampshire and his New Hampshire staff went to South Carolina, and so on and so on.
Whereas after 2008s primaries and caucuses, Obama left his ground game in place for the general election and left his general election organization in place for this year.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 14 queries.