MO-Chilenski Strategies/Missouri Scout: Romney up 6
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 09:00:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MO-Chilenski Strategies/Missouri Scout: Romney up 6
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-Chilenski Strategies/Missouri Scout: Romney up 6  (Read 831 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 27, 2012, 06:19:17 AM »

50-44 Romney

Respondents: 817 registered voters living in Missouri, with working telephones, who are
likely to vote in 2ovember 2012. The margin of error is +/-3.4%, IVR Study (9//20//2012).

http://moscout.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/MOScout-Poll-9.20.pdf
Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,628
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2012, 06:29:55 AM »

New Poll: Missouri President by Chilenski Strategies on 2012-09-26

Summary: D: 44%, R: 50%, I: 0%, U: 6%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2012, 08:58:07 AM »

I'm not really invested in who wins Missouri. I don't think Obama is all that likely to win it, really, unless he's doing so well that MO doesn't matter.

But it's worth noting that this is, according to its methodology notes:
a) an IVR poll, which therefore doesn't call cell phones, and which seems not to make any adjustment for the voters it might miss, and
b) a poll which weights for party ID, but not for race.

Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,952


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2012, 09:41:25 AM »

This same poll had TODD AKIN winning, so I don't place much faith in it.
Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2012, 09:55:22 AM »

This same poll had TODD AKIN winning, so I don't place much faith in it.
Lots of polls have shown Akin ahead, or within striking distance. That's, sadly, not unexpected.
Logged
timothyinMD
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 438


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2012, 11:08:03 AM »

The sample is 58-42 in favor of women.   2008 turn out was 54-46..

Probably Mitt by 8-9 and Akin by 2-3 then
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2012, 02:16:04 PM »

The sample is 58-42 in favor of women.   2008 turn out was 54-46..

Probably Mitt by 8-9 and Akin by 2-3 then

If you're attacking the fact that there're too many women, the partisan sample may be GOP-friendly Smiley Am I right?
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2012, 02:27:28 PM »

Nope.
Logged
mondale84
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2012, 02:57:20 PM »

LOL...no
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.