MA: Mideast Budget 2012 (Statute) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:17:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MA: Mideast Budget 2012 (Statute) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA: Mideast Budget 2012 (Statute)  (Read 6739 times)
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« on: October 02, 2012, 07:37:55 PM »

I would also be in favor of raising taxes on upper income levels and even adding more brackets. The corporate tax rate could also be raised a little bit, but not too much more then its current rate.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2012, 07:17:52 AM »

Let's not complicate the system more by adding more brackets and making the bottom 1% of people pay 1% of their income and the top 1% pay 99%. We should not be looking at income tax increases, nor should we be looking at gasoline tax increases. We cannot seek to make everyday life for middle class Mideasterners more difficult. When gas taxes increase, it does not harm the rich, only the middle class. We must be sane in approaching our budget shortfalls. At this point, we can only cut spending and wait until the economy improves.

That's actually not a bad idea. I feel like Mr. X said it best:

Regardless, the Mideast regional government ultimately needs more revenue if we are going to pass a balanced budget (or even anything close to that).  Budget shortfalls are a revenue problem first and a spending problem second (and sometimes only a revenue problem).


I'll vote for a few cuts in spending, but for me its going to have to about 2:1 (added revenue vs. less spending)
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2012, 09:42:05 AM »


It actually is a bad idea, because even if we as a region tax the top income bracket about 75% of their income whilst the Federal Government is taxing them 25% of their income, then they have no money! Wee! Then we have loads of poor people and the economy isn't flowing and then we have to tax people to pay for a stimulus to try to get things going but incidentally no one has any money left then the Government has all the money and the citizens have no money so the Government is handing out money to all the poors to try and get the economy going and once it does we're gonna take all that money back? That sounds incredibly absurd to me. I can't possibly envision how that might work in any way, shape or form.

I was somewhat joking. Yet I do think we can add a few more tax brackets and double the rates of the top income brackets. 6.5% is way to low!
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2012, 11:13:43 PM »

What we need is a more progressive tax system with more tax brackets.

Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2012, 11:46:45 AM »

What we need is a more progressive tax system with more tax brackets.

No, we don't.

The current tax rates are not fair to the lower and middle classes. The wealthy need to pay there part to help our great region.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2012, 10:35:21 PM »

Here is my proposal:

0-30,000 0%
30,001-250,000 4%
250,001-1,000,000 6%
1,000,000+ 10%

The rich must pay their fair share back to the region
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2012, 01:49:04 AM »

s
Here is my proposal:

0-30,000 0%
30,001-250,000 4%
250,001-1,000,000 6%
1,000,000+ 10%

The rich must pay their fair share back to the region

And why is "fair share" not 6%?  Shouldn't everyone pay their fair share?  Hence the "fair"?

The poor shouldn't have to say the same as millionaires. I withdraw my proposal and support TexasDem's proposal if we is willing to chance the brackets and rates a little bit. 
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2012, 04:20:41 PM »

I agree with Mr. X
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2012, 09:04:32 PM »

I'm willing to take a small progressive tax, with possibly only 2 or 3 brackets (though I prefer a flat tax). But I can't let it get too progressive - I don't too see too much of an increase, as the rich are already paying a pretty substantial tax rate from the federal government. I feel it'd be counterproductive.

We'll have to find some middle ground here, folks, as no one has a majority on this bill. Wink

What if we only had increases for the top three highest-income brackets (corporate and income), kept the other rates the same, and didn't reduce the number of brackets?

I would go with that idea
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2012, 07:04:36 PM »

Here is another proposal, removing one bracket, and changing the income tax rates slightly.

Income Tax Rate:
2%    $0 - $50,000
4.25%    $50,001 - $180,000
5.5%    $180,001 - $999,999
7%   $1,000,000+
1.5%   Employer contributions to pensions

Corporate Tax Rate:

0.5%    $0 - $75,000  
1.5%    $75,001 - $350,000
3%    $350,001 - $10,000,000
3.5%    $10,000,001 - $20,000,000
4%    $20,000,001-$70,000,000
5%   $70,000,001+

Thoughts? Ideas? Proposed changes?

What's clear is that neither a flat tax (supported by the Speaker, Governor, and Assemblyman 20RP12) or progressive system with more than four/five brackets (supported by Assemblyman Gass3268, Assemblyman Mr. X, and myself) can be enacted, so I hope this proposal, or the one I suggested earlier can be a sort of foundation for a middle ground.

Income Tax Rate:
1.5%    $0 - $50,000
3%    $50,001 - $180,000
4%    $180,001 - $750,000
5%    $750,001 - $2,750,000
6%   $2,750,001+
1.5%   Employer contributions to pensions

Corporate Tax Rate:

0.5%    $0 - $75,000  
1.5%    $75,001 - $350,000
3%    $350,001 - $10,000,000
3.5%    $10,000,001 - $20,000,000
4%    $20,000,001-$70,000,000
5%   $70,000,001+

I can live with this.

Would like a higher percent for the top bracket, but this is better.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2012, 08:31:43 PM »

Income Tax Rate:
0%    $0 - $13,000
3%    $13,001 - $250,000
5%    $250,001 - $999,999

7%    $1,000,000-$10,000,000
9%    $10,000,001+

As Assemblyman TexasDem wisely noted, neither side has enough votes to pass their ideal regional income tax rates.  The important thing is not to seek the rates we would pick were it up to us alone, but ones that we can live with.  This is a compromise that I can live with and one that I would urge both the Governor and my friends and colleagues in the Assembly to support!  Thoughts?

Can we change these two brackets to the following?

3%    $13,001 - $175,000
5%    $175,001 - $999,999

I like this a lot!
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2012, 01:54:58 PM »

Would anybody consider a 5 cent bag tax? They have it everywhere around DC. It would help bring in a little revenue and it would also help encourage people you use their own reusable bags. 
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2012, 01:57:25 PM »

Also I think we can still raise the income/corporate taxes, but it doesn't need to be as much as much as previously proposed.

Lastly, if we choose not to go the tax route, how do we get that last 1.64 billion?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2012, 06:59:50 PM »

I say that we vote on the Governor's amendment then go forward and pass this baby!
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2012, 07:51:58 PM »

AYE
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2012, 01:53:22 PM »

Ladies and gentleman, I believe we now have a balanced budget! Smiley Congratulations.

Nice work everyone!
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


« Reply #16 on: November 18, 2012, 05:35:00 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 13 queries.