A tribute to two great heroes

[Adam Griffin]

I know I speak for everyone when I say you will truly be missed. Your silly antics made the forum a brighter and better place. Keep on chasing rainbows, guys. We will remember you.

[Adam Griffin]

Proud and yet saddened to feature so prominently in this memorial.

It was the first trollicious post I came to when going through his memoirs. You were one of the last to speak with him. What was he like?

[Adam Griffin]

I didn't always agree with Mondale, but he shouldn't have been banned.

Mondale was a sock of KenyanObama. Depressing fact: they (he? it?) attend(s?) Princeton.

Was he banned because of that, because I thought that had been known for awhile? Perhaps he had a Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hide persona going on. Of course, now we'll never know (until next time).

You must be logged in to read this quote.

For Romney? This poll is overestimating Romney support.

That's why I've been saying Romney needs to pick Gohmert as VP to energize the base. That's the real problem, not independents.

LOL.
A nobody won't energize anything, since even the base doesn't know him.

The base knows its heroes and champions.

How is talking about terror babies at all heroic?

UMMM.....by bringing attention to a serious problem which threatens our national security.

Stop it. NOW.

[Adam Griffin]

And Hillary2012 was only banned for a week, so any memorial is premature.

Then in Ben's case, it becomes a wake (in the oldest sense)!

[Adam Griffin]

Hillary2012/Ben Romney is already unbanned. He could post again if he wants ...

It would seem our prayers have been answered, for he is risen.

[Adam Griffin]

No... it was made a temporary ban shortly after he was banned.  Long before this stupid thread was made.

See this?

And Hillary2012 was only banned for a week, so any memorial is premature.

Maybe if you had actually read the prior comments, you would have realized that the circumstances regarding Hillary2012 were clarified shortly after I posted. Long before your stupid comment was made.

[Adam Griffin]

I have read the prior comments (in fact I MADE a prior comment pointing out that he was not permabanned).  I'm just pointing out that your "prayers" were not answered here.

Then why reiterate it? Regardless of the circumstances of the ban, you do realize that the entire premise of the post was not to be taken seriously, right? Oh, you don't.

Clarification would not have been necessary if you wouldn't have made a faulty assumption memorializing a marginally (and that's generous) contributing poster and a puppetmaster who liked to argue with his sock.

And obviously since you have a chip on your shoulder - in addition to numerous responses by others outlining the circumstances behind Hillary2012 - your presence in this article would not have been necessary if some time were taken on your part to differentiate between content that is of no interest to you and content that genuinely requires your presence despite your lack of interest in it.