I really don't want to be 'that' person, but does D+3 make sense?
Again, I thought party ID was totally irrelevant to all of you. Where's Craigo when we really need him to remind us how stupid we all are?
But since you asked, sure, D+3 is feasible. It was D+8 in '08, EVEN in 2010, D+3 in '06, and R+ 5 in '04. So yeah, D+3 "makes sense."
But remember, you're stupid for talking about party ID. An amateur (j/k, of course
This shift in party ID between polls due to Romney's standing increasing suddenly seems to be completely attributable to the factors explained to us by Craigo. So I don't see your point