If the 2012 results mirror 2000 does either side concede?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:46:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  If the 2012 results mirror 2000 does either side concede?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If the 2012 results mirror 2000 does either side concede?  (Read 523 times)
JFK-Democrat
Rookie
**
Posts: 193
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 06, 2012, 09:42:33 PM »

So on the way to a landslide, the debates happened and now we have a close race, if the results are as close as 2000 with a lot of states decided by a handful of votes (less than .01%) in enough states to materially change the results will either side conceded, and are we heading back to the Supreme Court again?
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,679
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2012, 09:49:59 PM »

It probably would end up in court.  I don't know how it would end, but I'll bet the original Electoral College winner would be favored as in 2000.  I think an even better question is that if Obama were to lose the PV and win the EV, do a bunch of Republican controlled states start passing National Popular Vote in 2013?
Logged
Statesman
Rookie
**
Posts: 36
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2012, 11:35:48 PM »

What if December 21, 2012 is the day they finally call Ohio?

Could happen, but I doubt it.

It could be that close, but I think Obama still has this thing. Two more debates, with large amounts devoted to foreign policy, not Romney's strong suit.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2012, 01:39:48 AM »

What if December 21, 2012 is the day they finally call Ohio?

Could happen, but I doubt it.

It could be that close, but I think Obama still has this thing. Two more debates, with large amounts devoted to foreign policy, not Romney's strong suit.

"And the winner, by a margin of 21 votes, is-"

WORLD ENDS.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2012, 02:21:52 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Right,

"Mr President, why did you unilaterally declare war on Libya without the consent of congress?"

"Are you in fact aware that this contravenes the constitution of the United States to use the military to fuel your personal grudges?"
Logged
後援会
koenkai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,265


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2012, 02:18:34 PM »

It's quite possible that the tipping state in this election ends up being Wisconsin. Which mandates a recount for any vote result within .5%....so yeah. No.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,485
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2012, 02:26:15 PM »

I'm still wondering about what the tipping state would be.

I tend to think it would probably be Virginia.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 07, 2012, 02:27:56 PM »

I hear Governor Palin's available as a compromise candidate in the event of 269-269.
Logged
後援会
koenkai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,265


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2012, 02:35:40 PM »

I'm still wondering about what the tipping state would be.

I tend to think it would probably be Virginia.

If Virginia is the closest state in the election, Romney has probably lost. Because Ohio/Wisconsin/Nevada are then out of reach.
Logged
GMantis
Dessie Potter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,984
Bulgaria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 07, 2012, 02:36:49 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Right,

"Mr President, why did you unilaterally declare war on Libya without the consent of congress?"

"Are you in fact aware that this contravenes the constitution of the United States to use the military to fuel your personal grudges?"
Considering that Romney was first for the war (criticizing Obama for not going far enough), then against (criticizing Obama for going too far) and then was for the war when it was over, it's probably not Obama that fears being asked about Libya. Also, after so many years of war propaganda in the US, being against successful wars is generally not a very popular position. Now, if someone would ask Obama: "Mr President, if the purpose of the intervention of Libya was to protect the civilians, why did so many civilians die during this operation?" that would be awkward, but such a question will almost certainly not be asked.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.