OH: Marist College: Obama leads by six
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 04:10:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  OH: Marist College: Obama leads by six
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OH: Marist College: Obama leads by six  (Read 1349 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,776


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 10, 2012, 11:15:00 PM »

New Poll: Ohio President by Marist College on 2012-10-10

Summary: D: 51%, R: 45%, I: 0%, U: 4%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2012, 11:22:58 PM »

Eeeugk. This is depressing. Why is Ohio being such an HP state this year?
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2012, 11:24:54 PM »

Eeeugk. This is depressing. Why is Ohio being such an HP state this year?

Considering your nominee and his past....
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,405


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2012, 11:25:07 PM »

Eeeugk. This is depressing. Why is Ohio being such an HP state this year?

Romney specifically is a spectacularly bad fit for it. One of the states where he's not Generic R in a bad way.
Logged
Reds4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 789


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2012, 11:27:00 PM »

Nobody is going to want to hear this... but this poll's Party ID is Dems 40% GOP 29% for likely voters.. in 2008 it was Dems +8% and in 2004 it was GOP +5%. I don't think this poll is as good for Obama as it looks.. no way this state is more Democratic by 11 points this year.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,279
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2012, 11:27:05 PM »

Eeeugk. This is depressing. Why is Ohio being such an HP state this year?

Romney specifically is a spectacularly bad fit for it. One of the states where he's not Generic R in a bad way.

Makes me wonder how Santorum would be doing here at this point. Tongue
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2012, 11:29:30 PM »

Nobody is going to want to hear this... but this poll's Party ID is Dems 40% GOP 29% for likely voters.. in 2008 it was Dems +8% and in 2004 it was GOP +5%. I don't think this poll is as good for Obama as it looks.. no way this state is more Democratic by 11 points this year.

Give me a good reason not to agree with him and not cry "junk poll" as a result. Is it adjusted?
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,988
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2012, 11:30:58 PM »

The party ID is likely a bit off but Obama is still likely ahead here. Romney has poor favorables in the midwest and the auto bailout helps Obama here. If OH goes blue along with WI and NV, Romney hits a concrete wall at 267 ev.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2012, 11:32:41 PM »

Nobody is going to want to hear this... but this poll's Party ID is Dems 40% GOP 29% for likely voters.. in 2008 it was Dems +8% and in 2004 it was GOP +5%. I don't think this poll is as good for Obama as it looks.. no way this state is more Democratic by 11 points this year.

Give me a good reason not to agree with him and not cry "junk poll" as a result. Is it adjusted?

I believe there was an issue about ensuring early voters were covered... if you exclude early voters it was 48-46 Obama. But since 20% early voters... there's a strong Obama (therefore D lean)...
Logged
Reds4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 789


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2012, 11:35:20 PM »

I'm a Republican who supports Mitt Romney, but I'm fair about these polls... you don't see me coming out and crying about joke polls every time Romney is losing. I just know that the state of Ohio is far too divided right now to have anyone winning by much.. I think Obama is leading in the state by a point or so right now (and I'd guess he'll end up squeaking out a win in Ohio)... but this poll showing a 6 point lead with ridiculous party ID splits is nothing too to put any stock in.
Logged
pa2011
Rookie
**
Posts: 234
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2012, 11:36:10 PM »

Nobody is going to want to hear this... but this poll's Party ID is Dems 40% GOP 29% for likely voters.. in 2008 it was Dems +8% and in 2004 it was GOP +5%. I don't think this poll is as good for Obama as it looks.. no way this state is more Democratic by 11 points this year.

Not saying it will be D+11, but isn't Ohio one place where the R brand has been pretty damaged due to the governor and some internal things?  Regardless of the specifics of party ID, sort of clear Romney still has work to do there, especially when you consider he may not have many more weeks like this where he's basically been in the drivers seat.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2012, 11:39:45 PM »

I think the thing to note is that GOP registration outside of Rasmussen has dropped... there has been a big spike in 'Independent' self-ID. Many of them are actually GOP voters, who no longer self-identify. Part of the reason why Romney is doing so much better among 'Independents' than McCain did...

I think we need to be careful about EVERY poll...
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,471
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2012, 11:40:54 PM »

Romney must be wondering what the hell he has to do to win here. lol.

My advice would be to become a completely different person.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2012, 11:41:36 PM »

Ohio really being awesome for a change this year.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2012, 11:42:26 PM »

Does anyone here understand that pollsters don't go out and purposely call registered Democrats and Republicans?  Party IDs are reflective of an attitude, not a statistic that pollsters are basing who they call on.  I just don't know how many times this has to be repeated.  

Marist conducted NBC's last round of polls of the 9 swings states.  This shows improvement for Romney of about 2 pts.  This seems about right for a national swing of 3, considering the rough go of it Romney has had in the state since just about the beginning of the campaign.  Some of the most reputable pollsters had Romney down 8 in OH before the debate.  There are few things that are going to swing a state as large as Ohio 8 pts in the course of a week.  

It's a lean Obama state that Mitt needs... Mitt needs a repeat performance in Debate part deux.  He was admittedly excellent in execution in the first one.  
Logged
Reds4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 789


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 10, 2012, 11:43:51 PM »

Yes, I agree with this statement. I'm a Republican and I don't like what Kasich has done in the state. The GOP brand isn't strong here. It's a delicate balance though. Obama isn't popular here, so there is an opening for Romney.. but Romney isn't as popular here as several other swing states it seems. This poll is way off.. but Romney still has work to do.

Not saying it will be D+11, but isn't Ohio one place where the R brand has been pretty damaged due to the governor and some internal things?  Regardless of the specifics of party ID, sort of clear Romney still has work to do there, especially when you consider he may not have many more weeks like this where he's basically been in the drivers seat.
[/quote]
Logged
JFK-Democrat
Rookie
**
Posts: 193
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 10, 2012, 11:46:21 PM »

I like the results of this poll, but us Democrats always seem to win the battle and lose the war. Jon Husted is busy trying to STEAL OHIO for Romney. This poll means squat if democrats are systematically denied the right to cast ballots in Ohio

Logged
dspNY
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,860
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 10, 2012, 11:53:19 PM »

Romney's just a really poor cultural fit for Ohio...he could put on a hardhat and jeans and there's still no way he can etch-a-sketch himself into a popular candidate there

Somehow Romney must find a way to win in Ohio or he will lose
Logged
TrapperHawk
Rookie
**
Posts: 106
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2012, 12:33:33 AM »

I actually thought that Ohio would be a bit tighter than six points. Glad to say that I'm wrong. Perhaps Ohio will be more Democratic this year than I expected. Looks like ol' Mittens has his work cut out for him in the Buckeye State.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,937


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2012, 02:12:13 AM »

Explanation for the Dem ID advantage, from the pollsters themselves:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/10/14352371-nbcwsjmarist-poll-romney-gains-in-key-swing-states?lite
Logged
President von Cat
captain copernicus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 619


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2012, 03:03:55 AM »

So can the red avatars breath a collective sight of relief now and stop the shameful nonsense about racist Americans voting for Romney?
Logged
Knives
solopop
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,460
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 11, 2012, 05:44:34 AM »

What does HP mean?
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 11, 2012, 06:06:59 AM »

'HP' horrible person
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,133
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 11, 2012, 07:55:48 AM »

Reading the article about the poll, it stated that early voting helped push that up party ID for Democrats.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 11, 2012, 09:40:36 AM »

What percentage of the vote in Ohio is typically 'early voting'?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 13 queries.