NV-Dane & Associates: Romney+3
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:12:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NV-Dane & Associates: Romney+3
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NV-Dane & Associates: Romney+3  (Read 1153 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 12, 2012, 02:02:21 PM »

49-46 Romney

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/romney-leads-obama-in-nevada-based-on-recent-dane--associates-poll-173761381.html

Never heard of this pollster.

I've heard of Dan Jones, which is a UT pollster, but it's not the same.

They don't even seem to have a website (at least I didn't find it).
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,687
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2012, 02:06:51 PM »

No.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2012, 02:07:15 PM »

No poll has shown Romney ahead in Nevada in over a year, including President Obama's all time low Fall of 2011.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2012, 02:07:24 PM »

Based off some of the polls today, you could say this is the map:



Obama wins 271-267, but Iowa, which hasn't had a poll in the last few days, could give Romney over 270 without Ohio.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,939


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2012, 02:09:13 PM »

Yes, based on the mix of R-leaning and ARG polls from today, you could say that Romney is almost not losing the electoral college. Congratulations!
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2012, 02:37:14 PM »

Their press release touts how they are "highly accurate" because they use the same methodology as Rasmussen. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess this is a GOP pollster, probably doing a poll for Heller
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,738
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2012, 02:44:31 PM »

dominating
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2012, 02:45:53 PM »

Great news!
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 12, 2012, 02:50:30 PM »

We might see the 2004 map again.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 12, 2012, 02:51:59 PM »



Under the current EV distribution Bush would have won without Ohio.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,972


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 12, 2012, 03:14:23 PM »

Based off some of the polls today, you could say this is the map:



Obama wins 271-267, but Iowa, which hasn't had a poll in the last few days, could give Romney over 270 without Ohio.

No cherry picking from today's polls!

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=161516.msg0#new



Logged
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,076


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 12, 2012, 06:30:58 PM »

Interesting take by Jon Ralston (Dean of Nevada political reporters) on why most Nevada polls are garbage.

http://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/why-most-polls-done-nevada-are-garbage#.UHimGlHF1wg

FWIW he thinks Obama is up about 6.

Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,074


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 12, 2012, 07:35:26 PM »

Wasn't Obama severely underpolled here in 2008? I remember it being "close" but he ended up winning by a huge margin.
Logged
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,076


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 12, 2012, 07:43:26 PM »

Wasn't Obama severely underpolled here in 2008? I remember it being "close" but he ended up winning by a huge margin.

Final RCP average was Obama +6.5%. He won by 12.5%

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nv/nevada_mccain_vs_obama-252.html
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,687
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 12, 2012, 08:48:07 PM »

Wasn't Obama severely underpolled here in 2008? I remember it being "close" but he ended up winning by a huge margin.

Reid was also supposed to lose by 4 or 5.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 12, 2012, 08:49:09 PM »

What is up with all these weird third and fourth rate polling firms out of nowhere showing strong Romney performances?
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 12, 2012, 09:08:57 PM »

Attention ... and because RCP has no standards, they know it'll be included. Plus the RW blogosphere goes as nuts for dodgy polls as the LW one.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,839
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 12, 2012, 09:32:09 PM »

What is up with all these weird third and fourth rate polling firms out of nowhere showing strong Romney performances?

It could be that one or more of the following --

1. the Romney/Ryan campaign

2. The Republican Party

3. GOP front groups like Crossroads, FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity, and the Club for Growth

is/are commissioning swing-state polls from pollsters whose methodologies strongly favor Romney in an effort to sow despair or destructive anger among Democrats. Consider Pulse, really a subsidiary of Rasmussen; it will poll for anyone for a modest price. I ignore that pollster because the poll is likely bought by a political party or interest group.

Entities like PPP, Quinnipiac, Marist, and Selzer are not coming out with these polls. 
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 13, 2012, 01:10:01 AM »

What is up with all these weird third and fourth rate polling firms out of nowhere showing strong Romney performances?
1.  We had too many Democrat leaning polling firms in the last several months.
2.  Obama is sucking as a president to people who are not pro Obama
3.  People want somebody fresh to get this country in the right direction.
4.  Joe Biden is an arrogant, pompous liar.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 13, 2012, 01:11:14 AM »

What is up with all these weird third and fourth rate polling firms out of nowhere showing strong Romney performances?
1.  We had too many Democrat leaning polling firms in the last several months.
2.  Obama is sucking as a president to people who are not pro Obama
3.  People want somebody fresh to get this country in the right direction.
4.  Joe Biden is an arrogant, pompous liar.

So you accept they're bad pollsters with an agenda... good.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 13, 2012, 01:15:08 AM »

What is up with all these weird third and fourth rate polling firms out of nowhere showing strong Romney performances?
1.  We had too many Democrat leaning polling firms in the last several months.
2.  Obama is sucking as a president to people who are not pro Obama
3.  People want somebody fresh to get this country in the right direction.
4.  Joe Biden is an arrogant, pompous liar.

So you accept they're bad pollsters with an agenda... good.
It's subjective for that matter, however you look at it. It's only bad when you don't agree.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2012, 12:40:33 PM »

Lol at the republicans believing this poll.
Logged
nhmagic
azmagic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,097
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.62, S: 4.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 13, 2012, 02:30:51 PM »

Nevada could turn depending upon whats going on in the other states.  Obama won a lopsided victory in 2008 that isn't even close to the small but still relevant D lean the state now has.  That tells me that Nevada saw Ohio, NH and the eastern states vote for Obama and a bunch of republicans either went home or just voted for Obama as they were in the lines. 

If Romney is winning NH, VA, FL, NC, OH, then I'm guessing states like Colorado and Nevada will move even further his way as the night goes forward.  A lot of this is turnout dependent though.  Romney is Mormon - so we'll see if his ability to get nearly every single Mormon, including the ones hiding in the rocks of Nevada can beat Harry Reids union member/casino worker bussing to the polls.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 13, 2012, 02:35:49 PM »

Nevada could turn depending upon whats going on in the other states.  Obama won a lopsided victory in 2008 that isn't even close to the small but still relevant D lean the state now has.  That tells me that Nevada saw Ohio, NH and the eastern states vote for Obama and a bunch of republicans either went home or just voted for Obama as they were in the lines. 

If Romney is winning NH, VA, FL, NC, OH, then I'm guessing states like Colorado and Nevada will move even further his way as the night goes forward.  A lot of this is turnout dependent though.  Romney is Mormon - so we'll see if his ability to get nearly every single Mormon, including the ones hiding in the rocks of Nevada can beat Harry Reids union member/casino worker bussing to the polls.
I don't understand the Mormon argument. Mormons already vote in muc higher proportions than the normal population and way disproportionately more Republican. It shouldn't have much effect, if at all.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 14, 2012, 11:29:12 AM »

Lol at the republicans believing this poll.

Well, I think a few of us are asking, "What is Dane's track record."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 14 queries.