IL-10: Dold, Schneider lead in dueling internals

[krazen1211]

http://northbrook.patch.com/articles/dold-schneider-polls-tell-different-story

R:

Dold 46
Schneider 36


D:
Dold 43
Schneider 44


Romney 42
Obama 54




Great news! Dold is in an excellent position to break the vicious gerrymander.

[Small Business Owner of Any Repute]

Usually, bad Gerrymanders take a few cycles to fall apart. This one is crumbling before the first ballot has even been cast.

[Miles]

Great news! Dold is in an excellent position to break the vicious gerrymander.

Hasn't that line grown a bit old after the first two dozen times? I mean, could you give us at least  some new adjectives or something?

[morgieb]

Usually, bad Gerrymanders take a few cycles to fall apart. This one is crumbling before the first ballot has even been cast.

D+8 is not a bad gerrymander. The Illinois Democrat party is just overly incompetent.

[Small Business Owner of Any Repute]

Usually, bad Gerrymanders take a few cycles to fall apart. This one is crumbling before the first ballot has even been cast.

D+8 is not a bad gerrymander. The Illinois Democrat party is just overly incompetent.

This was a district that gave a non-incumbent, aggressively moderate Republican a two-point win in D+6 form. Bumping it up to D+8 is not a good Gerrymander, it's a risky one.

[Mr.Phips]

Usually, bad Gerrymanders take a few cycles to fall apart. This one is crumbling before the first ballot has even been cast.

D+8 is not a bad gerrymander. The Illinois Democrat party is just overly incompetent.

This was a district that gave a non-incumbent, aggressively moderate Republican a two-point win in D+6 form. Bumping it up to D+8 is not a good Gerrymander, it's a risky one.

And that was in the most pro-GOP cycle in over 100 years against a Democrat who probably couldnt beat Atilla the Hun.  Even Seals would have won under the new lines.