CO-PPP: Obama leads by 3%

[Lief 🗽]

Obama 50, Romney 47 (from twitter)

Their last poll (before the first debate) had Obama up by 6 points.

[Yank2133]

Obama is at 50......good, very good.

[Skill and Chance]

Between CO, IA and NH, they said CO was the best of the three for Obama.  That's a huge problem.

[5280]

So Obama -3 from the last PPP poll of Obama +6 in September, looks great but not good enough.  Romney needs to campaign harder in CO until the veins pop out of his head.

[dirks]

big -3 Debate bounce by Obama

[Yank2133]

big -3 Debate bounce by Obama

What?

The previous poll was taking in September, which makes it irrelevant.

[5280]

big -3 Debate bounce by Obama

What?

The previous poll was taking in September, which makes it irrelevant.

Obama doing 'slightly better' (which is subjective) than Romney on the 2nd debate, and Romney winning big on the 1st debate equals Obama losing points. Obama is still losing when you look at it from +6 in September PPP poll and +3 in October PPP poll, that's -3 points.  Secondly, PPP is a Democratic polster, not surprising.

[Yank2133]

big -3 Debate bounce by Obama

What?

The previous poll was taking in September, which makes it irrelevant.

Obama doing 'slightly better' (which is subjective) than Romney on the 2nd debate, and Romney winning big on the 1st debate equals Obama losing points. Obama is still losing when you look at it from +6 in September PPP poll and October PPP poll.

But it is stupid to compare a poll from September to a poll in October and say Obama got a -3 bump. The poll in September is out of date.

[NVGonzalez]

If CO has the same effects as NV I think Obama will win the state by 4 if things go like they are now.

[5280]

If CO has the same effects as NV I think Obama will win the state by 4 if things go like they are now.

I'm going to put out the blame of ignorant people who don't do enough research on why should Obama get another 4 years. It's simple as that.

[Likely Voter]

CO has been tracking the national avg so surprised to see PPP have national race tied and CO O+3

[Devils30]

PPP was actually the best pollster in Colorado in both 2008, 2010. In 08, they had Obama +10 (he won by 9) and 2010 they actually had Buck +1 (Bennet won by 1). All the other pollsters were off by about 4 here.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

If CO has the same effects as NV I think Obama will win the state by 4 if things go like they are now.

I'm going to put out the blame of ignorant people who don't do enough research on why should Obama get another 4 years. It's simple as that.

Yes, anyone who disagrees with you is an ignorant who doesn't do enough research.
Sure you're not a Paulite?

[memphis]

Between CO, IA and NH, they said CO was the best of the three for Obama.  That's a huge problem.

It would be nice to win all three, but Obama doesn't need to. Assuming FL and VA going for Romney, it's all about OH. With OH and CO, Obama wins. Without OH, Obama loses even with CO, IA, and NH.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

YouGov, Grove, PPP all have CO at +3 for the President.  Probably about right.  

[5280]

If CO has the same effects as NV I think Obama will win the state by 4 if things go like they are now.

I'm going to put out the blame of ignorant people who don't do enough research on why should Obama get another 4 years. It's simple as that.

Yes, anyone who disagrees with you is an ignorant who doesn't do enough research.
Sure you're not a Paulite?

If somebody voted for Obama the first time, and votes Romney the 2nd time, its enough evidence that they're not ignorant and done their research on why they changed sides.  Obama already proved to us his record, and voting for him again is appalling.  I don't need to get into details and specifics about each voters record.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

If CO has the same effects as NV I think Obama will win the state by 4 if things go like they are now.

I'm going to put out the blame of ignorant people who don't do enough research on why should Obama get another 4 years. It's simple as that.

Yes, anyone who disagrees with you is an ignorant who doesn't do enough research.
Sure you're not a Paulite?

If somebody voted for Obama the first time, and votes Romney the 2nd time, its enough evidence that they're not ignorant and done their research on why they changed sides.  Obama already proved to us his record, and voting for him again is appalling.  I don't need to get into details and specifics about each voters record.

If CO has the same effects as NV I think Obama will win the state by 4 if things go like they are now.

I'm going to put out the blame of ignorant people who don't do enough research on why should Obama get another 4 years. It's simple as that.

Yes, anyone who disagrees with you is an ignorant who doesn't do enough research.
Sure you're not a Paulite?

[Devils30]

No, if Obama loses Ohio he can still win if he takes CO, IA, NH, WI, NV= 272

[memphis]

No, if Obama loses Ohio he can still win if he takes CO, IA, NH, WI, NV= 272

Oops. I added wrong

[NVGonzalez]

If CO has the same effects as NV I think Obama will win the state by 4 if things go like they are now.

I'm going to put out the blame of ignorant people who don't do enough research on why should Obama get another 4 years. It's simple as that.

Yes, anyone who disagrees with you is an ignorant who doesn't do enough research.
Sure you're not a Paulite?

If somebody voted for Obama the first time, and votes Romney the 2nd time, its enough evidence that they're not ignorant and done their research on why they changed sides.  Obama already proved to us his record, and voting for him again is appalling.  I don't need to get into details and specifics about each voters record.

At least you're not creating some alternative universe of polling and recognize that you got work to do in CO. I'll take it.

[SPQR]

If CO has the same effects as NV I think Obama will win the state by 4 if things go like they are now.

I'm going to put out the blame of ignorant people who don't do enough research on why should Obama get another 4 years. It's simple as that.

Yes, anyone who disagrees with you is an ignorant who doesn't do enough research.
Sure you're not a Paulite?

If somebody voted for Obama the first time, and votes Romney the 2nd time, its enough evidence that they're not ignorant and done their research on why they changed sides.  Obama already proved to us his record, and voting for him again is appalling.  I don't need to get into details and specifics about each voters record.

LOL
Whoever doesn't agree with my views is ignorant.

Fascist.

[opebo]

So Obama -3 from the last PPP poll of Obama +6 in September, looks great but not good enough. 

Doesn't look great for you, bub, as lots of polls in the intervening time had the state mostly about tied or with a point up for Romney, so this looks very solid.

[Lief 🗽]

New Poll: Colorado President by Public Policy Polling on 2012-10-18

Summary: D: 49%, R: 44%, I: 4%, U: 3%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

[Lief 🗽]

There's actually little change in the numbers when you look at the question including Gary Johnson: Obama's lead shrinks from 6% in September to 5% now.

[Gass3268]

There's actually little change in the numbers when you look at the question including Gary Johnson: Obama's lead shrinks from 6% in September to 5% now.

Even better