Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 19, 2019, 05:22:26 pm
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

  Atlas Forum
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  National, Monmouth: Romney in the lead
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: National, Monmouth: Romney in the lead  (Read 501 times)
krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7,390


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 22, 2012, 11:37:31 am »

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/84/159/2147483694/0e2e970e-a544-4f4d-8659-6233705b8ae7.pdf

Romney 48
Obama 45


Great news! Romney is being lifted by his excellent +10 favorables as well as Paul Ryan's excellent +11 favorables.
Logged
Yank2133
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5,034


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2012, 11:39:19 am »

Obama with only a 6 point lead among Latinos.......lol
Logged
أندرو
afleitch
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24,806


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -8.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2012, 11:53:03 am »

Obama with only a 6 point lead among Latinos.......lol

See my post on this.
Logged
HokeyDood
HockeyDude
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10,628
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2012, 11:59:21 am »

Obama with only a 6 point lead among Latinos.......lol

hahahaha... thats awesome. 
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29,311


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2012, 12:30:32 pm »

Criticizing subsamples doesn't necessarily make any sense.

I can't recall the poll board ever being this bad. Everyone just pretends as if every poll going against their candidate is useless with arguments of ever-decreasing quality.
Logged
Umengus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2,175
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2012, 12:31:04 pm »

Party id= D +4
Logged
LiberalJunkie
LiberalJunkie99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 671
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2012, 12:32:55 pm »

HAHAHAHA 6 points?!?!?
Logged
أندرو
afleitch
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24,806


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -8.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2012, 12:39:43 pm »

Criticizing subsamples doesn't necessarily make any sense.

I can't recall the poll board ever being this bad. Everyone just pretends as if every poll going against their candidate is useless with arguments of ever-decreasing quality.

I agree with you when it comes to party ID etc, but I think there is some credence in being concerned with demographic sub samples which don't change nationally by too much year on year. I mean this poll is pretty consistent (when compared with other polls) when it comes to White and Black voting intention; but it sticks out like a sore thumb with Hispanics. It would be the same if a poll suddenly showed Romney within 10% of Obama on the black vote despite that not happening in any national election in the modern era.
Logged
Beat-‘Em-All Beto
Clinton1996
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,417
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2012, 02:19:20 pm »

Is there a reason RCP includes this crappy pollster, Rasmussen, the Wash Times, and Politico but not PPP?
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,644
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2012, 02:21:30 pm »

Because RCP is a joke run by Republican hacks. They're also not including the Democracy Corps survey, showing Obama up by 3, for some reason
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2012, 02:25:09 pm »

Criticizing subsamples doesn't necessarily make any sense.

I can't recall the poll board ever being this bad. Everyone just pretends as if every poll going against their candidate is useless with arguments of ever-decreasing quality.

Pretty much this.
Logged
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18,307
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 22, 2012, 02:29:43 pm »

How reliable in Monmouth?  First time I ever heard of it.
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2012, 02:32:21 pm »

How reliable in Monmouth?  First time I ever heard of it.

It's a uni poll, so it is not particularly good. 
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17,553


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2012, 02:52:39 pm »

Criticizing subsamples doesn't necessarily make any sense.

I can't recall the poll board ever being this bad. Everyone just pretends as if every poll going against their candidate is useless with arguments of ever-decreasing quality.

What's really galling are the bogus claims of false equivalence.
Logged
Lief 🐋
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40,644
Dominica


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2012, 02:55:24 pm »

Gustaf loves bogus equivalence. It's no coincidence that he's complaining about this in a thread where the red avatars are (rightfully) criticizing a suspect poll.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC