MN: Mason-Dixon: Obama with Slight Lead in Minnesota
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:37:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  MN: Mason-Dixon: Obama with Slight Lead in Minnesota
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: MN: Mason-Dixon: Obama with Slight Lead in Minnesota  (Read 4955 times)
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: October 28, 2012, 08:49:33 PM »

M-D is phenomenal.  I think Romney is trending upward in the Heartland. 

This is why I like you, J.J.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: October 28, 2012, 10:07:58 PM »

If Romney campaigns in MN it wont look like he is a momentum candidate expanding the map, it will look like he is a desperate candidate trying to find a path around Ohio.
Seriously?

1) I think any rational person will agree that if Romney wins Minnesota of all states, he wins Ohio with ease. Minnesota is a tier 2 state to any Republican win. (Akin to NC going into the D camp, you'd be looking at a 300-350 EV scenario).
2) Virginia is pretty much closed off to campaigning for a few days.
3) It's not like Romney can't do a MSP-suburbs/pick a city in Wisconsin two-stopper with ease.
4) Any trip into the MSP area, will be beamed into Northwestern WI. It's a two-fer.
5) Expanding the map and making your opponent play defense is NOT a bad tactic. Especially when your opponent may be stuck in DC for a few days being President.

The time for Romney to expand the map was 2 weeks ago when he had momentum and he was polling ahead in at least half of the battleground states but since then things have been flat or receding and his OH problem looms larger and larger and so a move into MN will be seen more as a way around his OH problem and not really expanding the map. Or that is my bet on how the MSM would cover it
Logged
Seriously?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: October 28, 2012, 10:10:58 PM »

If Romney campaigns in MN it wont look like he is a momentum candidate expanding the map, it will look like he is a desperate candidate trying to find a path around Ohio.
Seriously?

1) I think any rational person will agree that if Romney wins Minnesota of all states, he wins Ohio with ease. Minnesota is a tier 2 state to any Republican win. (Akin to NC going into the D camp, you'd be looking at a 300-350 EV scenario).
2) Virginia is pretty much closed off to campaigning for a few days.
3) It's not like Romney can't do a MSP-suburbs/pick a city in Wisconsin two-stopper with ease.
4) Any trip into the MSP area, will be beamed into Northwestern WI. It's a two-fer.
5) Expanding the map and making your opponent play defense is NOT a bad tactic. Especially when your opponent may be stuck in DC for a few days being President.

The time for Romney to expand the map was 2 weeks ago when he had momentum and he was polling ahead in at least half of the battleground states but since then things have been flat or receding and his OH problem looms larger and larger and so a move into MN will be seen more as a way around his OH problem and not really expanding the map. Or that is my bet on how the MSM would cover it
Doubt it. Only because even with perceived bias, the media gets better ratings if the race is considered a horse race.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.