Susquehanna Polling/Tribune-Review: PA: Tie (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 03:50:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Susquehanna Polling/Tribune-Review: PA: Tie (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Susquehanna Polling/Tribune-Review: PA: Tie  (Read 8162 times)
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« on: November 03, 2012, 11:18:39 PM »


Their last poll was an internal for the Pennsylvania Republican Party.  There really can't be a direct comparison.

Both were polls by Susquehanna Polling & Research Institute.  That's my direct comparison.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2012, 11:26:51 PM »


Their last poll was an internal for the Pennsylvania Republican Party.  There really can't be a direct comparison.

Both were polls by Susquehanna Polling & Research Institute.  That's my direct comparison.

Compare internals to public polls at your own peril - even if they are from the same pollster.  There's an agenda behind internals that isn't there for public polls.

Well, the last Susquehanna that wasn't an internal had Obama up 47-45 in early October.  Their non-internals are just as big of outliers and favorable to Republicans as their Tribune polls.  But even if you don't believe that, 47-45 to 47-47 is almost no movement.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2012, 01:44:26 PM »

Predicting Obama +8 when the final is Obama +11 is not close enough, especially when used to argue a state Obama is probably only going to win by 5 is tied.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2012, 02:29:35 AM »

Predicting Obama +8 when the final is Obama +11 is not close enough, especially when used to argue a state Obama is probably only going to win by 5 is tied.

If a pollster does not get the exact margin you discredit them? Marist was off by 3 as well in PA (other direction). Do you discredit all their polls for this reason as well?

I'm not discrediting Susquehanna.   What I'm saying is that it doesn't prove they're accurate.   Not a single real pollster (Strategic Vision was proven to be fake) missed the train that Obama won Pennsylvania.  No real pollster could have possibly be wrong.  He won the election by 10.5 points.  

If they predicted it with precision, then maybe you could sway me that this poll could be right.  Missing it by 3 is not precision.  They predicted a solid D state in 2008 to go D.   As far as I'm concerned, they are an outlier among a dozen other pollsters who were "good in 2008" on PA and say PA is Obama's.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 14 queries.