Thailand House of Representatives up for reelection
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 05:03:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Thailand House of Representatives up for reelection
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Thailand House of Representatives up for reelection  (Read 1984 times)
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 05, 2005, 11:52:57 PM »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thailand_legislative_election%2C_2005

Legislative elections will be held in Thailand on 6 February 2005. At stake will be 500 seats in the House of Representatives (Sapha Poothaen Rassadorn). The House of Representatives consists of 400 members elected from single-member constituences and 100 members elected from national party lists on a proportional basis.

 
An election poster for Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra in Bangkok, January 2005At the January 2001 elections, the Thais Love Thais Party (Phak Thai Rak Thai) of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra won 248 of the 500 seats, and gained a majority by forming an alliance with the Thai Nation Party (Phak Chart Thai) of Chatichai Choonavan, which won 41 seats. Since then Thaksin's party has absorbed three minor parties, giving him about 300 seats in the legislature. The main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Thailand (Phak Prachatipat) won 128 seats in 2001.

At this election Thaksin's party is seeking to win an absolute majority in its own right, something no political party has ever achieved in Thailand at a genuinely free election (elections before 1992 were frequently rigged). A coalition of other parties and civil society groups has been formed to prevent this, arguing that Thaksin already has too much power and that giving him an absolute parliamentary majority will encourge what they allege are his authoritarian tendencies. Prominent academic Kasem Sirisamphan, for example, accuses Thaksin of running a "parliamentary dictatorship" and says that "people do not want a billionaire prime minister to further dominate the country and its politics."

Thaksin's party replies that it has provided Thailand with stable, competent and corruption-free government, although critics say that corruption has actually increased under Thaksin's watch. Party spokesperson Suranand Vejjajiva said that Thais Love Thais was "the first party which could translate its populist policies into action. Its achievements and Mr Thaksin's vision give the party a clear edge and it will win an absolute majority," he said.

Since 2001 the Thai party situation has been simplified by the disappearance of minor parties. Nearly all seats are expected to go to Thais Love Thais, Thai Nation and the Democratic Party. The only other significant party is the Great People Party (Phak Mahachon), a breakaway group from the Democratic Party.

The Democratic Party, now led by Banyat Bantadtan, does not seriously expect to defeat the coalition of the other two parties, but hopes to win 200 seats, which would be a gain of 70 seats. Thai Nation hopes mainly to avoid being eclipsed by its dominant coalition partner.

 
Promotion for Thaksin Shinawatra and his party on a Bangkok tuk-tuk (taxi)Thai politics tend to be regionally based. Thaksin is strongest in the north-east region (Isan), the poorest and most populated part of the country, where his populist policies are most popular. He is also dominant in the north, since he was born in Chiang Mai and has directed much government spending to his home region. Additionally, Thaksin's pro-business policies have won him a substantial following among the urban middle-class in Bangkok, the wealthiest part of the country. Thais Love Thais is strong in the Chao Phraya valley as well, although the region has historicaly been a stronghold of Thai Nation, which still dominates in some of the central provinces. The Democrats are strongest in the south, but also have strength among liberal-minded voters in the capital.

In the absence of reliable opinion polls, the outcome is hard to predict. During 2004 most observers suggested that Thaksin's popularity had declined since its peak in 2002, and that he was unlikely to achieve an absolute majority for his own party. The deaths of Muslim protesters in southern Thailand and the bird flu outbreak were seen as issues which the Thaksin government had handled badly.

These calculations have been upset by the disaster of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, which devastated six southern coastal provinces. The tsunami and its aftermath had several effects on Thai politics: it drove the election campaign to a large extent out of the media, and also produced a strong sense of national solidarity, from both of which an incumbent government could be expected to benefit. Finally, most commentators have praised the Thaksin government's response to the disaster. Political commentator Veera Prateepchaikul, who identifies himself as an opponent of Thaksin, wrote in the Bangkok Post on 10 January: "Mr Thaksin deserves credit for his quick response to the disaster, his decisive leadership and his skills in crisis management."

Veera also pointed out that the provinces directly affected by the tsunami were part of the Democratic Party's southern stronghold, and that Thaksin's high profile, particularly on television, in delivering aid to the area might improve his party's chances of winning more seats in the south. "The Democrats might cry foul that Mr Thaksin is using the state media for campaign purposes," Veera wrote, "but the people may think otherwise." Only a miracle, he wrote, could turn the "tsunami tide which is now clearly in favour of Mr Thaksin."

Given such increased expectations, a failure by Thais Love Thais to win 250 seats would now be seen as a considerable setback for Thaksin. The Bangkok newspaper The Nation published predictions by its reporters on 8 January, predicting that of the 400 constituency seats, Thais Love Thais would win 233, the Democrats 94, Thai Nation 47 and Great People 26. If the parties achieved similar results in the 100 proportionate seats, this would give Thais Love Thais about 290 seats overall and the Democrats about 120 seats.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2005, 06:56:15 AM »

Very informative.  Alas there seems to be no getting rid of the 'Thai Bush'.  Thaksin is a nightmare for the expat.  Recently I heard he hopes to 'close down all the bars' by 2008 - which means the sex industry.  Already his party has instituted all sorts of reductions in freedom and individual rights, from reduced opening hours for bars to the extrajudicial killing of drug sellers.

The man is a puritan - odd in asia, but he is extremely Westernized, in all the worst ways.  He's the sort that thinks a woman is better off working for $5/day in a sweatshop than for $30/day in the relatively easy and pleasant sex business.  If he has his way, Thailand - formerly the handsdown best place in the world - will soon be as barren a wasteland as Midwestern America.

I suppose the only hope is some kind of a coup détat.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2005, 01:57:25 PM »

And the exit polls say landslide for Thais Love Thais:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4240523.stm

And opebo, you really, really have no idea about the sex trade. I may be a liberal, but I detest it.

Reducing bar opening hours is not a reduction in freedom. It doesn't stop you drinking at home.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2005, 07:08:49 AM »

M hm.
400 seats for Shinawatra, 80 for the Democrats...those minor parties mentioned in the article above aren't even mentioned in the BBC article linked.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2005, 08:48:40 AM »
« Edited: February 07, 2005, 08:50:49 AM by opebo »

And the exit polls say landslide for Thais Love Thais:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4240523.stm

And opebo, you really, really have no idea about the sex trade. I may be a liberal, but I detest it.

Reducing bar opening hours is not a reduction in freedom. It doesn't stop you drinking at home.

Yes, reducing bar hours is a blatant and offensive reduction in freedom, and the sex business is no different from any other business selling a product or service desired by paying customers.  If you think so you're a prude.
Logged
Notre Dame rules!
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 777


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2005, 10:37:54 PM »

opebo,

Are you serious?  A business where women (girls really) are sold into an industry rife with AIDS and other STDs is pleasant?  Gimme a break!
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2005, 10:43:55 PM »

opebo,

Are you serious?  A business where women (girls really) are sold into an industry rife with AIDS and other STDs is pleasant?  Gimme a break!

leave it, don't waste your time on him. 
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2005, 08:34:25 AM »

opebo,

Are you serious?  A business where women (girls really) are sold into an industry rife with AIDS and other STDs is pleasant?  Gimme a break!

You obviously know nothing about it other than the propaganda you get in the US.

1) all the girls are strictly over 18, and in fact the great majority are in their 20's and 30's (even fourties! keep in mind plenty of customers are around 70).  The laws against bars employing under 18's are strictly enforced.

2) they're not sold into anything, they're eager job applicants, for the obvious reason that the work is very easy and the income is about 5 to 10 times what they could earn elsewhere.  Good looking girls earn as much as middle managers! 

Lastly the bar owners have no interest in coercing anyone, as they always have plenty of applicants for their lucrative positions.   One freqently sees girls change bars on a whim, merely because she 'didn't like a girl there', or had an argument with the mamasan.  The whole situation is very fluid and free, like any job market.

3) Stds are not a very big issue for two reasons - condom use is the norm, and most of the customers in the foreign oriented industry are fairly well off middle aged and elderly white northern Europeans - a group that has some of the lowest hiv rates in the world. 

On the rare occasions that a girl might consider not using a condom, it would be when a long term and lucrative live-in relationship or actual marraige has developed - typically with an expat retiree.  It is also commonplace that testing of both parties would occur before taking this step.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 11 queries.