When will we see this map
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 10:05:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  When will we see this map
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
2008-2020
 
#2
2024-2048
 
#3
2052-2076
 
#4
2076-2100
 
#5
After 2100
 
#6
Never
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: When will we see this map  (Read 3773 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 21, 2007, 05:48:25 PM »

Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2007, 06:18:19 PM »

Something weird will happen in about half a century, producing another 1936.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2007, 10:16:20 PM »

The percents being correct in every state is really unlikely statistically just because there are so many permutations. As far as every state being Dem except Nebraska, Wyoming, and Utah, I suppose it's possible though not currently foreseeable to have a Democratic Ronald Reagan in the next couple of decades.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,172
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2007, 06:18:29 PM »

barack obama runs in 2024 and becomes Reagan, FDR, and Martin Luther King all rolled into one.
Logged
auburntiger
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2007, 08:14:57 PM »

It could happen sooner than people think, depending if a cataclysmic event takes place, and however the next president handles the War on Terror. Of course, we could see this too:


Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2007, 09:44:44 PM »

It could happen sooner than people think, depending if a cataclysmic event takes place, and however the next president handles the War on Terror. Of course, we could see this too:




How could Democrats win New York and lose Vermont?
Logged
auburntiger
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2007, 03:46:17 AM »

It could happen sooner than people think, depending if a cataclysmic event takes place, and however the next president handles the War on Terror. Of course, we could see this too:




How could Democrats win New York and lose Vermont?

I always thought of NY as more of a Democratic bastion than VT. If you're assuming a 10% swing from 2004, you'd be right. Is VT more liberal than NY?
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2007, 09:57:46 PM »

It could happen sooner than people think, depending if a cataclysmic event takes place, and however the next president handles the War on Terror. Of course, we could see this too:




How could Democrats win New York and lose Vermont?

I always thought of NY as more of a Democratic bastion than VT. If you're assuming a 10% swing from 2004, you'd be right. Is VT more liberal than NY?
Vermont is more socially Liberal and New York is more economically liberal. Vermont has less partisanship too, so I would say that it is very possible that New York could be Democratic with Vermont being Republican.
Logged
Fingolfin
Rookie
**
Posts: 36
Portugal


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2007, 06:03:02 AM »
« Edited: November 28, 2007, 07:24:13 AM by Fingolfin »

When we have on the ticket Chelsea Clinton with one of Bu$hes tweens. One will smoke without inale it, the other will drink her father bourbon and US will be led to an age of peace and prosperaty.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2007, 09:22:52 PM »

Too bad the Best Newbie nominations are over.
Logged
Fingolfin
Rookie
**
Posts: 36
Portugal


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2007, 07:23:13 AM »

I will take that as a compliment
Smiley
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,420
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2007, 01:54:36 AM »

hopefully 2008
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2007, 02:33:31 AM »

I always thought of NY as more of a Democratic bastion than VT. If you're assuming a 10% swing from 2004, you'd be right. Is VT more liberal than NY?

Vermont's state legislature voted to approve impeaching Bush and Cheney.  I don't think they're too fond of the Republicans.
Logged
gorkay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 995


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 01, 2007, 12:42:44 PM »

I'd like to see it, but we won't, at least not in the foreseeable future.
Logged
auburntiger
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,233
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.61, S: 0.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 03, 2007, 06:45:16 PM »

I always thought of NY as more of a Democratic bastion than VT. If you're assuming a 10% swing from 2004, you'd be right. Is VT more liberal than NY?

Vermont's state legislature voted to approve impeaching Bush and Cheney.  I don't think they're too fond of the Republicans.

Maybe not...but it's the Bush-type Republicans that don't go over so well in the northeast. The VT governor is a Republican and favored to win re-election.
Logged
SamInTheSouth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 389


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 05, 2007, 08:11:57 PM »

I always thought of NY as more of a Democratic bastion than VT. If you're assuming a 10% swing from 2004, you'd be right. Is VT more liberal than NY?

Vermont's state legislature voted to approve impeaching Bush and Cheney.  I don't think they're too fond of the Republicans.

If the GOP ran a fiscally conservative, socially liberal candidate they could win in Vermont.  It wasn't all that long ago that Vermont was a Republican bastion.  There is a lot of libertarianism in the northeast and I think that is why the GOP has lost their place there because they have been catering more to social issues rather than more libertarian issues like they used to be.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 06, 2007, 04:04:38 PM »
« Edited: December 06, 2007, 04:06:34 PM by Verily »

I always thought of NY as more of a Democratic bastion than VT. If you're assuming a 10% swing from 2004, you'd be right. Is VT more liberal than NY?

Vermont's state legislature voted to approve impeaching Bush and Cheney.  I don't think they're too fond of the Republicans.

If the GOP ran a fiscally conservative, socially liberal candidate they could win in Vermont.  It wasn't all that long ago that Vermont was a Republican bastion.  There is a lot of libertarianism in the northeast and I think that is why the GOP has lost their place there because they have been catering more to social issues rather than more libertarian issues like they used to be.

Vermont, at least, has changed radically, and characterizing it as "libertarian" is hopelessly misguided. The state sends a self-professed socialist to the Senate, and the Vermont Progressive Party, a social democratic to socialist party, is the most successful state-level third party in the nation.
Logged
SamInTheSouth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 389


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 06, 2007, 11:04:52 PM »

I always thought of NY as more of a Democratic bastion than VT. If you're assuming a 10% swing from 2004, you'd be right. Is VT more liberal than NY?

Vermont's state legislature voted to approve impeaching Bush and Cheney.  I don't think they're too fond of the Republicans.

If the GOP ran a fiscally conservative, socially liberal candidate they could win in Vermont.  It wasn't all that long ago that Vermont was a Republican bastion.  There is a lot of libertarianism in the northeast and I think that is why the GOP has lost their place there because they have been catering more to social issues rather than more libertarian issues like they used to be.

Vermont, at least, has changed radically, and characterizing it as "libertarian" is hopelessly misguided. The state sends a self-professed socialist to the Senate, and the Vermont Progressive Party, a social democratic to socialist party, is the most successful state-level third party in the nation.

I am aware of that, but Martha Rainville still managed to get 45% of the vote in Vermont last year when she ran for Congress and that was a year in which the GOP was getting their butts whomped.  It's not hopeless yet.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 07, 2007, 12:07:09 AM »

I always thought of NY as more of a Democratic bastion than VT. If you're assuming a 10% swing from 2004, you'd be right. Is VT more liberal than NY?

Vermont's state legislature voted to approve impeaching Bush and Cheney.  I don't think they're too fond of the Republicans.

If the GOP ran a fiscally conservative, socially liberal candidate they could win in Vermont.  It wasn't all that long ago that Vermont was a Republican bastion.  There is a lot of libertarianism in the northeast and I think that is why the GOP has lost their place there because they have been catering more to social issues rather than more libertarian issues like they used to be.

Vermont, at least, has changed radically, and characterizing it as "libertarian" is hopelessly misguided. The state sends a self-professed socialist to the Senate, and the Vermont Progressive Party, a social democratic to socialist party, is the most successful state-level third party in the nation.

I am aware of that, but Martha Rainville still managed to get 45% of the vote in Vermont last year when she ran for Congress and that was a year in which the GOP was getting their butts whomped.  It's not hopeless yet.

Martha Rainville basically ran against everything the Republican Party stands for, too. Her "success" should be an indication of how hopeless Vermont is for Republicans. (I'm speaking in general terms; they do elect Republicans occasionally, such as their governor. Of course, even Massachusetts does that sometimes.)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.238 seconds with 15 queries.