Politico:Bobby Jindal rejects Mitt Romney’s ‘gifts’ theory

[Incipimus iterum]

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892.html?hp=f1

[Maxwell]

I love Jindal's strategy so far.

[Paul Kemp]

It's sad when sanity and common sense is news.

[DemPGH]

It's about ideas and plans, not the color of skin, the gender, or the C.V. of the person running. If Jindal runs it can't be on "cut taxes" and "outlaw abortion."

[Small Business Owner of Any Repute]

Spoken from someone who truly sees the train headed for the broken bridge.

[Badger]

Spoken from someone who truly sees the train headed for the broken bridge.

And wants to be the engineer, regardless.

[Adam Griffin]

Good for Jindal. Unfortunately, the majority of American voters will reject his allowance of creationism to be taught in Louisiana schools. He really used to be a viable option, but he's taken the cheap and loose route these past couple of years to please those-who-shall-not-be-named. DOA.

[CountryRoads]

He's going to run in 2016, it looks like.

[hopper]

I like Jindal stepping up to the plate for the party in the last several days.

[John Dibble]

I'm glad that Jindal wants to try to get votes from the other side. Perhaps he can publicly recant on his stance that creationism should be taught in public schools as a first step.