VA: Quinnipiac University: Terry McAuliffe (D) leads Ken Cuccinelli (R) by 4
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 01:03:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections
  2023 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  VA: Quinnipiac University: Terry McAuliffe (D) leads Ken Cuccinelli (R) by 4
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VA: Quinnipiac University: Terry McAuliffe (D) leads Ken Cuccinelli (R) by 4  (Read 1235 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 01, 2012, 09:54:04 AM »

New Poll: Virginia Governor by Quinnipiac University on 2012-11-28

Summary: D: 41%, R: 37%, U: 21%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2012, 09:56:00 AM »

Dave, whenever you enter a poll the "VA" or "NJ" is missing somehow.

Can you fix this ? (Of course I can edit it manually after entering the poll, but it would be better if you can fix it).

Thx.
Logged
ElectionAtlas
Atlas Proginator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,629
United States


P P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2012, 04:17:15 PM »

Hi,
Yeah, I saw this, but have not thus far identified why its missing.  Will look into.
Thanks,
Dave
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2012, 01:00:57 PM »

Huh.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2012, 08:08:44 PM »
« Edited: December 04, 2012, 08:16:05 PM by Maxwell »

More proof Ken Cuccinelli is way too right-wing.

How is someone like McAuliffe with a lead right now?
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,634
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2012, 08:28:11 PM »

But I got told this was Safe R!1!!1!
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2013, 07:23:45 PM »

Junk poll. On on off year election, the turnout will not be 28% R, 35% D and 32% I. The 2009 wave that swept Bob McDonnell into power was 37% R, 33% D and 30% I, and McAuliffe is not getting more turnout than Deeds.

Cool story, bro.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2013, 07:41:58 PM »

Junk poll. On on off year election, the turnout will not be 28% R, 35% D and 32% I. The 2009 wave that swept Bob McDonnell into power was 37% R, 33% D and 30% I, and McAuliffe is not getting more turnout than Deeds.

This poll also has 9% less whites than occured in 2009.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/11/04/us/politics/1104-va-exit-poll.html
Remeber before the 2012 election?  There was a significant portion of the blue avatars saying exactly the same thing that you ware saying right now.  No way will Democrats have the party ID advantage in this kind of environment.  The polls are wrong. 

Well guess what, the polls weren't wrong, they didn't secretly weigh all of their samples according to party ID, and Obama really did win.  Yet here we are with posters saying the exact things that were proven wrong 3 months ago.

2009 was a strong year for Republicans, a prelude to 2010.  2013 does not have to be identical to 2009.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2013, 09:31:12 PM »

A) 35% isn't that different than 33%.  An electorate thats 2% more democratic than previous similar election shouldn't be surprising to people. 

B) You can reason it away however you want.  It may even make some sense.  But if the polls consistantly show a certain result, then that result will most likely occur.  Experience has shown this to be true.   
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.