Change of Allegiance (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:37:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Change of Allegiance (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Change of Allegiance  (Read 6097 times)
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« on: April 01, 2004, 11:27:53 AM »

WHAT? Shocked

Explanation please? Shocked

Smiley
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2004, 11:34:13 AM »

OK...so I'm guessing that this is some sort of joke then... Wink
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2004, 11:35:21 AM »


I am SO DUM. Sad
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2004, 08:35:11 AM »

Why not add to the perceived arrogance of Americans?  Go ahead.  Don't you realize that neither Democrats nor Republicans had anything to do with starting WWII.  The pacific theater began about a year before Roosevelt was even elected for his first term, and the European theater began more than two years before our country got involved.  Sometimes it is said North Americans have a shallow view, or an inaccurate view of world history.  Most of the time, the posters on this forum show contradictory evidence.  Unfortunately, often enough, sometimes the posts herein support that conclusion.  Please, give your collective ethnocentries a little rest.

I suppose that you're refering to the Japanse-Chinese war?

It depends on how counter-factual one wants to be...the Versailles Treaty with its harshness towards Germany obviously is part of the reason, and the WWI entente, in particular France, is to blame for this. One can also blame the Western Democracies for not standing up to Hitler...that would be the US a little more perhaps, considering your isolationist polciies. Then there is of course the German people and especially the NSDAP who has some smaller part of the blame as well... Tongue
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2004, 01:41:09 PM »

Why not add to the perceived arrogance of Americans?  Go ahead.  Don't you realize that neither Democrats nor Republicans had anything to do with starting WWII.  The pacific theater began about a year before Roosevelt was even elected for his first term, and the European theater began more than two years before our country got involved.  Sometimes it is said North Americans have a shallow view, or an inaccurate view of world history.  Most of the time, the posters on this forum show contradictory evidence.  Unfortunately, often enough, sometimes the posts herein support that conclusion.  Please, give your collective ethnocentries a little rest.

I suppose that you're refering to the Japanse-Chinese war?

It depends on how counter-factual one wants to be...the Versailles Treaty with its harshness towards Germany obviously is part of the reason, and the WWI entente, in particular France, is to blame for this. One can also blame the Western Democracies for not standing up to Hitler...that would be the US a little more perhaps, considering your isolationist polciies. Then there is of course the German people and especially the NSDAP who has some smaller part of the blame as well... Tongue

Yeah, in the Western theater, I think Versailles and France bear that responsibility.  I think the nsdap was just a natural nationalistic response to that harshness.  And, yes, chamberlain and his friends in washington, in both parties, were hoping to avoid conflict.  Hindsight is 20/20.  Don't you agree?

On hindsight? Yes, of course, but that doesn't change the harsh fact that Chamberlain was wrong and Churchill was right. Now, let's not get started on Halifax...
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2004, 01:54:44 PM »

I missed the chance for April Fools, me and my friends were hanging out and by the time we realised it was 1st of April it was about 6pm

HAH! Same with me though... Sad
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2004, 03:42:06 PM »

I surrender.  You must know that I cannot possibly expect to escape any denigration of Churchill unscathed by either the American right or the European right.  Not sure I want to anyway, as the negative campaign against him in 1945 attaching him to Germans (recall the old movietone reels with the stressed pronunciation of Friedrich von Hayak run by his opponents on the Left), made me feel sorry for the man.  Like the way I felt sorry for Clarence Thomas about 15 years ago.  I still abhore negative campaigns.

A history buff like you might enjoy a perusal of the original Halifax/Roosevelt documents in some moment of spare time:
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ww2.htm



I accept your surrender. Wink
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2004, 09:01:59 AM »

The LN failed due to lack of backing, just like the Versailles Treaty, even though the latter was flawed from the beginning really.

Chamberlain wasn't really a pacifist, he was reliably hawkish after he had realized his mistake.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.