I can't believe people in this thread are defending drunk driving.
There are those on this forum who will say anything to get attention. Tweed, Opebo, etc. will espouse insane and illogical and dangerous views because we react to them.
I think the strawman you are quoting is something that was designed just "to get attention." If someone is drunk and driving that is clearly a problem and I don't see anyone in this thread defending that sort of behavior. The problem with you and your attention seeking friend is somewhere along the way someone forgot to teach you, people are unique and no one with a high school level of science knowledge would ever make the ridiculous claim that one blood level obtained by a suspect test like a breathalyzer is definitive proof of the same level of mental impairment in 100% of the population 100% of the time. And it is certainly not enough to label one person completely fine and one person a felon. Breathalyzers and the 0.08% limit are a farce and a joke.
It's unbelievable in a first world country with a constitution people are routinely imprisoned with nothing more than a 0.08% breathalyzer result and the half @$$ed testimony of a cop. I mean if 0.08% was used for something like a modest fine I could understand. But a felony conviction?!
