CO-06: Romanoff looking into run against Coffman (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:29:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  CO-06: Romanoff looking into run against Coffman (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CO-06: Romanoff looking into run against Coffman  (Read 1466 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« on: January 15, 2013, 12:55:12 PM »
Article.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The district is about D+1 at 51.6/46.5 Obama.

Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2013, 05:32:46 PM »
Coffman isn't trying for Senate.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2013, 12:12:15 PM »
Quote from: Zioneer on January 26, 2013, 11:03:10 AM
How good of a chance does Romanoff have?

He's probably as good a recruit that Democrats could get here. Coffman won by 3 points in 2012, but I'm not sure how much worse turnout will be in an off-year.

In 2010, Romanoff made a point of not taking super PAC money, ŕ la Feingold. That may need to change this time.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2013, 03:02:14 PM »

Gardner doesn't seem to have much fire in his belly either.

Udall, Hagan, Shaheen and Pryor would all theoretically be vulnerable, but they might all get passes because none of the A Team Republicans seem committed to running in those states.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.