Is monogamy becoming an underrated value in our society? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 03:42:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Is monogamy becoming an underrated value in our society? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Maybe
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 46

Author Topic: Is monogamy becoming an underrated value in our society?  (Read 13961 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,189
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: February 24, 2013, 05:40:33 PM »

Monogamy no.

Long-term romantic commitment (between two or more people, with or without sexual exclusivity) very very much yes.

This.

If we have come to accept, after centuries of denials, that genuine feelings of love can emerge between two people of the same sex, I don't think it's much of a stretch to assume that it might be possible for a person to develop genuine feelings or love for more than one person at the same time.

Obviously, "polygamy" as practiced in modern days and in history, is something disgusting and generally oppressive toward women. So voted yes.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,189
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2013, 07:44:16 PM »

I would argue monogamy is much easier. You know what to expect, when and how to expect it, and what the outcome might be. When you deal with tons of people, hard telling what you will get. It is far stressful for me to be single than to be in a relationship.

Easiest for me is cooping myself up in my room and only talking to intimate friends and family, so...

My life.

Mine too... though not entirely by choice.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,189
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2013, 03:56:55 PM »


Yes, it clearly is... though not in the way you intended.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,189
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2013, 04:07:06 PM »


Yes, it clearly is... though not in the way you intended.

Tony, what is it that gets you going about Nathan's point of view?

Regardless of Nathan's point of view (which is obviously much closer to mine than mine is to yours), he's being as articulate as one possibly can on these kinds of topics, while you are just... being yourself.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,189
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2013, 11:04:44 PM »

I love how Snowy starts with "This thread has a lot of experts about women.  A lot of pontificating and high horsing." and then goes on into a long rant explaining what women supposedly are... Roll Eyes
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.