Bermondsey thirty years later
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:30:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Bermondsey thirty years later
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bermondsey thirty years later  (Read 1187 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 24, 2013, 05:36:13 PM »

Today is the thirtieth anniversary of the Bermondsey by-election. It's a useful anniversary to reflect on a couple of things, I think...
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,626
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2013, 05:49:22 PM »

On the rebirth of the Liberals, or on the hypocrisy of some politicians?
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,864


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2013, 06:15:10 PM »

44.2% swing, the highest in by-election history.

It's a complicated election. I looked through the literature a while back after a Lib Dem friend claimed that the worst smearing probably came from John O'Grady the 'Real Bermondsey Labour' candidate. His literature is fairly mild mostly making inferences to Tatchell's 'militant' tendency so it doesn't compare the Simon Hughes' 'Straight Choice' or a cartoon of him punching Tatchell in a boxing ring.

O'Grady was apparently doing well until the end of the campaign which was around the time the Liberals upped the anti. However Tatchell was an awful candidate and ran an awful campaign and tried to retreat back into the closet. In terms of British elections, it's no Miranda Grell. The campaign even pales in comparison to the openly homophobic campaigns you still find in the States today.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2013, 06:33:05 PM »

A brief summary of the background to the campaign, which is less known than what happened next:

The Bermondsey constituency1 covered the northern third of the London borough of Southwark and was a Labour stronghold; it had been held since 1974 by Bob Mellish2 who had represented seats in the area since 1946,2 and had often been a base for leading London Labour figures of the old Morrisonian school. Mellish had a majority of 38.6% in 1979 and that was unusually low for him. Half of the seat was a picture of classic inner city decay, the other half (traditionally dependent on the docks; all closed or closing by this point) listed in more post-industrial direction. Mellish had been appointed Vice Chairman of the Thatcher government's controversial London Docklands Development Corporation4 and was pretty obviously going to retire.

As the area had depopulated and deindustrialised, the foundations of the locally dominant T&G based Labour machine had started to fall apart. New people, middle class New Left activists (some Trots) with university degrees, had moved into the area and had taken control of Bermondsey CLP from the old hands. The factional infighting was bitter and resulted in the deselection of Sir Reg Goodwin5 (who held the parallel GLC constituency) in 1981. Mellish called it a day hoping that an old mate of his, John O'Grady the leader of Southwark council, would be selected. Bermondsey CLP instead selected Peter Tatchell (yes that one) and Mellish threw a hissy fit of volcanic proportions.6

Tatchell's politics were hard-left and then some (this is sometimes glossed over a little bit in coverage of the by-election). And Mellish threw very impressive hissy fits, apparently. The result was that Michael Foot publicly declared that Tatchell would not be endorsed as an official candidate by Labour. But this state of affairs didn't last, and it soon became clear that Tatchell would be endorsed by the NEC if he were selected by Bermondsey CLP again. Mellish threw another hissy fit, was ignored, left the Party he'd devoted his life to7, and quit the Commons, triggering a by-election...

1. Which still exists, comparatively unaltered, as 'Bermondsey & Old Southwark.'
2. An old-fashioned Labour right-winger and T&GWU man who had served as Chief Whip under Wilson.
3. One of which had exactly the same name ('Bermondsey') but which covered a significantly smaller area.
4. Supposedly a bold attempt to regenerate a depressed area; in reality an agent for enforced gentrification at the point of a compulsory purchase order and for the expansion of London's financial district into historically working class territory along the lower Thames. The area had been the site of the great London Dock Strike of 1889 and the birth of trade union power in London's politics.
5. Leader of Greater London Council 1973-1977. He had held a seat in Bermondsey since the 1940s on first the LCC than then the GLC and had previously led the borough council.
6. Tatchell has claimed that Mellish was bisexual and tried to proposition him once. It's not certain how true this is.
7. Eventually joining the SDP and finding it less than entirely congenial for the same reasons that other working class right-wingers who ended up in it did. He was apparently a rather sad figure at the end of his life, deeply regretting the cutting of his ties to the political culture that he belonged to at an emotional level. He would presumably have rejoined (as almost all ex-Labour SDP MPs of his type did) had he not been in the Lords by that point.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2013, 06:37:07 PM »

It's a complicated election. I looked through the literature a while back after a Lib Dem friend claimed that the worst smearing probably came from John O'Grady the 'Real Bermondsey Labour' candidate. His literature is fairly mild mostly making inferences to Tatchell's 'militant' tendency so it doesn't compare the Simon Hughes' 'Straight Choice' or a cartoon of him punching Tatchell in a boxing ring.

One issue is that the seriously nasty stuff didn't make it into leaflets (quite an old fashioned dirty dirty campaign in that respect). O'Grady apparently spent some of the campaign singing homophobic ditties on the back of a beer cart.
Logged
Leftbehind
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2013, 06:51:02 PM »
« Edited: February 24, 2013, 06:55:16 PM by Leftbehind »

I think the real nastiness of it was born by the Tory press more than anything, with the national spotlight on it - churning out endless caricatures of a militant coupled with blatant homophobia. I do think the disowning of Tatchell was one of the few things I'd criticise Foot for. Tatchell was on Newnight the other night (with Simon Hughes in recognition of its anniversary) and he said most of the positions he was most lambasted for are now the norm.
Logged
stepney
Rookie
**
Posts: 123
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2013, 04:23:56 AM »

O'Grady apparently spent some of the campaign singing homophobic ditties on the back of a beer cart.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rIxqSNgKmU

(From three minutes in to six minutes in) Featuring part of said ditty, Peter Tatchell’s 1983 comedy cockney accent, and “TATCHELL IS A COMMUNIST POOF” painted in four-foot high letters up a dock wall.
Logged
joevsimp
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 482


Political Matrix
E: -5.95, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2013, 03:40:23 PM »

Tatchell was on Newnight the other night (with Simon Hughes in recognition of its anniversary) and he said most of the positions he was most lambasted for are now the norm.

*toddles over to iPlayer*
Logged
Kitteh
drj101
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,436
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2013, 07:43:37 PM »

What I've never quite understood is why the by-election was such a long-term shift in the area's politics. Hughes was reelected easily in the next general election, and nowadays the area is pretty strong for Lib Dems in local government elections and such. Could someone explain this?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,726
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2013, 07:51:13 PM »

What I've never quite understood is why the by-election was such a long-term shift in the area's politics. Hughes was reelected easily in the next general election, and nowadays the area is pretty strong for Lib Dems in local government elections and such. Could someone explain this?

A certain type of Liberal has always been able to establish a certain type of local personality cult, given the right circumstances. Circumstances for Hughes (once elected) were absolutely ideal; my long post upthread more or less explains why. Since then the area has changed a lot, and in ways very favourable for a LibDem of the clean-up-this-dog-sh!t-now stripe.

Still, re-election is going to be tricky for him next time round.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,562
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2013, 02:48:13 PM »

It's a complicated election. I looked through the literature a while back after a Lib Dem friend claimed that the worst smearing probably came from John O'Grady the 'Real Bermondsey Labour' candidate. His literature is fairly mild mostly making inferences to Tatchell's 'militant' tendency so it doesn't compare the Simon Hughes' 'Straight Choice' or a cartoon of him punching Tatchell in a boxing ring.

One issue is that the seriously nasty stuff didn't make it into leaflets (quite an old fashioned dirty dirty campaign in that respect). O'Grady apparently spent some of the campaign singing homophobic ditties on the back of a beer cart.

... and at least one of the worst leaflets ("Which Queen Will You Vote For?") was anonymous.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 11 queries.