Why did Jill Stein do so well in Easton, MA? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 03:31:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Jill Stein do so well in Easton, MA? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Jill Stein do so well in Easton, MA?  (Read 2373 times)
MarkD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,169
United States


« on: July 31, 2017, 03:33:18 PM »

This bugs me. In 2016, by comparison, Easton Precinct 1 cast 640 votes for Clinton, 505 votes for Trump, 59 votes for Johnson, and 12 votes for Stein. The official results for 2012 -- 15 votes for  Obama but 633 for Stein -- obviously have to be wrong. The most likely truth of how that precinct voted in 2012 was 633 for Obama, 487 for Romney, 15 for Johnson, and 4 for Stein. I wonder what it takes to get the S.O.S. office to correct that discrepancy?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.