Connecticut Dem has acre of Everglades available for bashful teenage girls

[dead0man]

link
What he said to the 17 year old girl

You must be logged in to read this quote.

  What he meant....apparently....and he somehow said this with a straight face

You must be logged in to read this quote.

He also refuses to have female interns because he doesn't trust himself with them.  Classy classy fellow.

[© tweed]

I guess when this happens to a Dem it is with the teenage women and not the men.  (obligatory)

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

OK, but what would "If you are shy then I have an acre of land in the Everglades", even if he didn't mean it sexually?

[Sopranos Republican]

If this guy was a pub, then there would already be 20 comments on this thread.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

If this guy was a pub, then there would already be 20 comments on this thread.

Not really.  The Europeans don't care too much about this sort of thing and the Democrats are largely still asleep.

[ingemann]

If this guy was a pub, then there would already be 20 comments on this thread.

Yes and most of them would be congratulation to GOP because at least it wasn't for bashful teenage boys.

Okay let's be serious. The truth are that there would be more comments, because GOP style itself the party of values and families, in the same way we see more comments, when Democratic politicians have a freeze full of cash, than when Republicans are corrupts.

[Napoleon]

Who?

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

They found me.

[Benj]

Yeah, it's bad. Obscure state legislators are obscure, though, so not sure why this is supposed to be a big story outside of Connecticut/his district.

[Antonio the Sixth]

LOL

[opebo]

Yes, America's prudery is a terrible sickness.  Shocking.  Sad.

Is that the reaction you were looking for?

[Beet]

Yes, America's prudery is a terrible sickness.  Shocking.  Sad.

It's not prudery. It's rudeness. In any case, what Benj said.

[opebo]

Yes, America's prudery is a terrible sickness.  Shocking.  Sad.

It's not prudery. It's rudeness. In any case, what Benj said.

So what now?  Legislators have to resign if they're slightly rude?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Yes, America's prudery is a terrible sickness.  Shocking.  Sad.

It's not prudery. It's rudeness. In any case, what Benj said.

So what now?  Legislators have to resign if they're slightly rude?

Very rude, in sexually predatory ways, yes.

[Beet]

Right. Imagine you are a minor, giving a presentation to a governmental legislative body full of respected adults on a matter very important to you. And you receive a remark that imparts that the legislator is just thinking he wants to be sexual with you. First of all, with one word it's a dismissal of whatever you've said as unimportant. Two, it's imparting that at that moment, they see you more as a sexual object than a human being. Three, it's their presumption that it's appropriate for them to let you know this (not sure which is more insulting; assuming that you'd be flattered by such a comment, or that it doesn't matter how you feel about it). Four, you know that a man much more powerful than you wants to have sex with you that you would never consent to, which can be intimidating. There's all kinds of layers of fycked up in that one little comment.

[Sopranos Republican]

They found me.

LOL

[badgate]

Maybe he takes the girls to his acre in the Everglades and hunts them at night

[Vosem]

I just heard someone say something similar in Biology (except it was "caecilian" rather than "snake", but that's what you get in Biology).

[DC Al Fine]

Yeah, it's bad. Obscure state legislators are obscure, though, so not sure why this is supposed to be a big story outside of Connecticut/his district.

Please post this in every "Obscure GOP legislator is bad" thread

[opebo]

So what now?  Legislators have to resign if they're slightly rude?

Very rude, in sexually predatory ways, yes.

You considering making a double ententre about your penis to a female to be 'sexually predatory'?  So, you wish to bar heterosexual males from holding office?

[Antonio the Sixth]

So what now?  Legislators have to resign if they're slightly rude?

Very rude, in sexually predatory ways, yes.

You considering making a double ententre about your penis to a female to be 'sexually predatory'?  So, you wish to bar heterosexual males from holding office?

You sure like to think all heterosexual males are like you... Fortunately for humanity, it's not the case (though, undoubtedly, your types are far more common that one may initially think).

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

So what now?  Legislators have to resign if they're slightly rude?

Very rude, in sexually predatory ways, yes.

You considering making a double ententre about your penis to a female to be 'sexually predatory'?  So, you wish to bar heterosexual males from holding office?

The demographic profile of my ideal officeholder would be mentally ill, non-heterosexual female clergy, actually.

[Antonio the Sixth]

So what now?  Legislators have to resign if they're slightly rude?

Very rude, in sexually predatory ways, yes.

You considering making a double ententre about your penis to a female to be 'sexually predatory'?  So, you wish to bar heterosexual males from holding office?

The demographic profile of my ideal officeholder would be mentally ill, non-heterosexual female clergy, actually.

I would say the ideal officeholder should have no gender, no race, no religion, no socioeconomic background, etc. - or at least not be aware of them. The veil of ignorance notion seems fundamentally true to me.

[Napoleon]

So what now?  Legislators have to resign if they're slightly rude?

Very rude, in sexually predatory ways, yes.

You considering making a double ententre about your penis to a female to be 'sexually predatory'?  So, you wish to bar heterosexual males from holding office?

The demographic profile of my ideal officeholder would be mentally ill, non-heterosexual female clergy, actually.

I would say the ideal officeholder should have no gender, no race, no religion, no socioeconomic background, etc. - or at least not be aware of them. The veil of ignorance notion seems fundamentally true to me.

Rawls! I Rawls

[Antonio the Sixth]

So what now?  Legislators have to resign if they're slightly rude?

Very rude, in sexually predatory ways, yes.

You considering making a double ententre about your penis to a female to be 'sexually predatory'?  So, you wish to bar heterosexual males from holding office?

The demographic profile of my ideal officeholder would be mentally ill, non-heterosexual female clergy, actually.

I would say the ideal officeholder should have no gender, no race, no religion, no socioeconomic background, etc. - or at least not be aware of them. The veil of ignorance notion seems fundamentally true to me.

Rawls! I Rawls

Really? So I'm not the only huge Rawls fan on this forum? Great to know!