We should unban Simfan for an hour, just so he can respond to this

[traininthedistance]

Nutella-gate at Columbia:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/07/nyregion/for-columbia-students-nutella-in-a-dining-hall-may-be-too-tempting.html

Oh, and it gets better, where "it gets better" basically means the NYT got trolled:

http://gothamist.com/2013/03/08/nutella-gate_revealed_columbia_stud.php

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

How about 2am to 3am ET tomorrow?

[opebo]

Another demonstration of the obvious fact that bannings make the forum poorer.

[opebo]

Another demonstration of the obvious fact that bannings make the forum poorer.

Oh really?

So.. you're saying it is ok to lose Simfan if he can come back for 2-3 soon-to-be-deleted posts once in a while under another name?  I hardly find that to be the same at all.  The forum is clearly poorer for his absence, and for the absence of all the others. 

[opebo]

I miss his posts, too, but - if that psychotic poster really is Simfan - calling the forum "poorer for his absence" seems incorrect to me.

Really?  I didn't have that reaction at all.  Interesting.

[Lambsbread]

Never let him back.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Another demonstration of the obvious fact that bannings make the forum poorer.

Oh really?

Expected this to link to jmfcst's page...

[Lief 🗽]

This forum would obviously be much better if forum heroes like Simfan and jmctsf were allowed to return forever.