William Shakespeare, Quentin Tarantino or Lena Dunham (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 01:03:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  William Shakespeare, Quentin Tarantino or Lena Dunham (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who is the best scriptwriter?
#1
Shakespeare
 
#2
Tarantino
 
#3
Dunham
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: William Shakespeare, Quentin Tarantino or Lena Dunham  (Read 7142 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« on: March 18, 2013, 02:46:14 PM »

please stop
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2013, 01:49:36 PM »

The language of Shakespeare is so similar to what's spoken now that (famously, gloriously, etc) if something sounds dirty, then it always is.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2013, 01:55:27 PM »

A big reason Shakespeare comes across as boring is that it has often been performed so boringly.

I think very few people can understand the language today.  Its rather like listening to people from the North of England talking - you get some very rough idea what is going on, but it isn't fun after about five minutes.
^^^^^^^
Biggest waste of high school. And that says a lot. He gets crazy respect because he's old.  The iambic pentameter is an impressive feat, but it's also a pretty stupid literary device that I find very distracting. It's like somebody is dribbling a basketball during every play. His storytelling isn't all that imaginative. He took a lot of ideas from others, as the idea of plagiarism wasn't yet a thing.  

You must have a terminally dull mind. Of course that was an established fact already, but there's nowt wrong with additional confirmation.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2013, 08:30:21 AM »

It's not the fault of medieval and early modern writers that they didn't hold perceived originality of the surface text in as high regard as we do.

Yes, preciousness about 'originality' is very much a modern thing. As you'll know anyway, a very, very high proportion of literature from the middle ages is essentially fanfic.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2013, 08:34:01 AM »

In any event, mere story isn't why Shakespeare is fantastic.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.