PPP (National Poll): Hillary with small leads, Biden actually trails Christie
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 11:12:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  PPP (National Poll): Hillary with small leads, Biden actually trails Christie
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP (National Poll): Hillary with small leads, Biden actually trails Christie  (Read 1903 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 03, 2013, 01:00:35 PM »

When it comes to general election match ups Hillary Clinton leads the Republicans we tested against her by margins ranging from 4 to 7 points. Chris Christie comes the closest at 46/42, followed by Rand Paul at 49/43 and then Marco Rubio at 49/42 and Paul Ryan at 50/43. We've consistently found that Christie would be the strongest Republican candidate but the problem for him is that Obama voters (42/24) like him better than Romney voters (36/31), which could making securing the nomination a problem.

Joe Biden does on average 6 points worse than Hillary Clinton in general election match ups against the Republicans. He leads Rubio (46/44), Ryan (48/45), and Paul (47/43), but by narrower margins than Clinton in all three cases. And he actually trails Christie by a pretty large margin at 49/40.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_4313.pdf
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2013, 06:11:07 PM »

Clinton 46%
Christie 42%

Clinton 49%
Paul 43%

Clinton 49%
Rubio 42%

Clinton 50%
Ryan 43%

Christie 49%
Biden 40%

Biden 47%
Paul 43%

Biden 46%
Rubio 44%

Biden 48%
Ryan 45%
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2013, 06:36:13 PM »

Christie we love you!

Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2013, 08:13:01 PM »

favorable/unfavorable ratings:

Christie 39/28% for +11%
Clinton 50/42% for +8%
Rubio 35/30% for +5%
Ryan 42/39% for +3%
Warren 23/22% for +1%
Paul 36/37% for -1%
Martinez 14/17% for -3%
Jindal 24/28% for -4%
Patrick 11/15% for -4%
Warner 11/15% for -4%
O'Malley 7/13% for -6%
Biden 40/47% for -7%
Bush 30/37% for -7%
Gillibrand 11/18% for -7%
Schweitzer 5/13% for -8%
Santorum 27/41% for -14%
Cuomo 22/36% for -14%
Perry 24/41% for -17%

Christie is actually more popular with Democrats than Republicans:

Christie fav/unfav:
Dems: 42/22% for +20%
Reps: 39/30% for +9%
Indies: 37/31% for +6%

Whereas Clinton's popularity comes more from her huge numbers among Democrats:

Clinton fav/unfav:
Dems: 87/8% for +79%
Reps: 17/74% for -57%
Indies: 42/47% for -5%

If Christie's name recognition was as high as Clinton's he'd probably be tied with or even slightly ahead of Clinton.

Biden, Clinton, and Cuomo all have huge gender gaps in their favorability.  Much bigger than any of the Republicans.

Clinton fav/unfav:
men: 45/50% for -5%
women: 55/34% for +21%

Rubio has (barely) net positive favorability among Hispanics.  The only other Republican with net positive favorability among Hispanics is Christie.

Rubio fav/unfav:
Hispanics 39/38% for +1%
whites 36/29% for +7%
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,401
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2013, 11:25:26 PM »

Certainly not a terrible result for Republicans - Clinton certainly isn't invincible like some on here would like to believe, though it's an uphill climb.
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,831


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2013, 12:58:04 PM »

JUNK POLL! (;
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2013, 03:12:59 PM »


Its nice to not have polling threads derailed into those silly arguments. But I suspect in 2016 the poll truthers will be back
Logged
Comrade Funk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,135
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -5.91

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2013, 09:27:53 PM »

Christie is actually more popular with Democrats than Republicans:
And there lies the problem with Christie. They will never nominate a moderate New Jersey Republican.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2013, 09:31:15 PM »

Certainly not a terrible result for Republicans - Clinton certainly isn't invincible like some on here would like to believe, though it's an uphill climb.

Christie, or someone in his mold, are the only ones capable of winning an election in 2016, barring terrible economic conditions. Your party will not allow it though.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 08, 2013, 01:35:54 AM »

Certainly not a terrible result for Republicans - Clinton certainly isn't invincible like some on here would like to believe, though it's an uphill climb.

She is the only one with a favorable rating at or above 50%. In fact she is the only one with a favorability rating even close to 50%!

The Republicans are going to need someone with the political skills of Barack Obama to beat her in the general election should she be the nominee.  Who could that be?

Ronald Reagan is no longer available. 
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2013, 07:46:20 AM »

Certainly not a terrible result for Republicans - Clinton certainly isn't invincible like some on here would like to believe, though it's an uphill climb.

She is the only one with a favorable rating at or above 50%. In fact she is the only one with a favorability rating even close to 50%!

The Republicans are going to need someone with the political skills of Barack Obama to beat her in the general election should she be the nominee.  Who could that be?

Ronald Reagan is no longer available. 

It's partially just a consequence of her being the only one with >90% name recognition.  If Christie had the same name recognition as Hillary Clinton, he'd be at 50% favorability too!  Obviously, once the campaign gets started, some of these other candidates will build on their current name recognition, and the GOP nominee, whoever he turns out to be, will have name recognition comparable to Clinton by Election Day 2016.

Not to say that that nominee's favorability will match Clinton's on election day, but your 1-to-1 comparison of the favorable number at this point seems pretty silly.
Logged
Old Man Svensson
Wyodon
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 593


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 11, 2013, 01:50:47 PM »

Christie is actually more popular with Democrats than Republicans:

And there lies the problem with Christie. They will never nominate a moderate New Jersey Republican.

I wouldn't assume that just yet. The founders of the Tea Party themselves have admitted that the hyperpartisanship craze is over.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2013, 07:47:44 PM »


Too bad Republican primary voters don't.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.