Hillary Clinton/Gavin Newsom vs Michelle Bachmann/Brian Sandoval
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 10:45:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Hillary Clinton/Gavin Newsom vs Michelle Bachmann/Brian Sandoval
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hillary Clinton/Gavin Newsom vs Michelle Bachmann/Brian Sandoval  (Read 2604 times)
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 25, 2013, 10:44:04 AM »

How much does Clinton win by?
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2013, 10:52:57 AM »

Clinton wins all of the things.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,142
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2013, 11:26:52 AM »

This thread assumes Michele Bachmann could get a running mate.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2013, 12:21:35 PM »

I'd vote for Hillary over Bachmann, but Gavin Newsom is too slimy to earn my vote in any other situation.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,145
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2013, 12:41:04 PM »
« Edited: April 25, 2013, 12:56:30 PM by SawxDem »



500-38.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2013, 12:48:41 PM »

Not even Sandoval could turn this ish around.
Logged
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,930
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2013, 01:37:24 PM »
« Edited: April 25, 2013, 01:40:23 PM by Liberalrocks »



This although Bachmann may win Mississippi by about a 1000 or so votes. Clinton wins over 60% of the national popular vote and wins at least 60% in the Kerry states 0f 04'.
Logged
PolitiJunkie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,124


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2013, 05:02:34 PM »

Being VERY generous to Bachmann...

Safe D (332 EV): Vermont, New York, Washington, California, Illinois, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Hawaii, DC, Maryland, Delaware, Minnesota, Michigan, Oregon, New Mexico, Maine, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, Florida, New Jersey

Likely D (64 EV): Montana, Arkansas, Missouri, Louisiana, North Carolina, Arizona, Indiana

Lean D (88 EV): Kentucky, Alaska, Tennessee, North Dakota, Texas, South Carolina, Georgia

Toss-Up (19 EV): West Virginia, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas

Lean R (15 EV): Alabama, Mississippi

Likely R (20 EV): Oklahoma, Idaho, Utah, Wyoming

Safe R (0 EV): None

Note that all the "Safe D" states are the states Obama won in 2012.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2013, 04:56:56 PM »

It would be an ass-kicking. I'm using the Missouri Senate race as a model, but assuming a cycle that would otherwise be slightly more Republican leaning.

So if McCaskill won by 15 points in a year that favored Democrats, Hillary Clinton would beat Michelle Bachmann by about 10 points half the time. In Missouri.

Likely Republican...(19 electoral votes)
Utah. Wyoming. Oklahoma. Idaho. That only really conservative district in Nebraska.

Leaning Republican...(27 electoral votes)
West Virginia. Kentucky, Alabama, Most of Nebraska.

Toss-Up (Republican Advantage) (17 electoral votes)
Kansas. Tennessee.

Toss-Up (Democratic Advantage) (18 electoral votes)
North Dakota. South Dakota. Arkansas. Louisiana.

That Republican ticket would result in a strong possibility of a center-right independent bid, which would further shake things up.

Hillary Clinton might spend the majority of her time campaigning for down-ticket races.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,538
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 26, 2013, 07:42:04 PM »

Hillary wins in a landslide.  People will vote on the candidates for President, and their running mates won't matter much.
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,687
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2013, 11:28:42 AM »

Sandoval wouldn't ruin his political career like this.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 01, 2013, 12:47:17 PM »

Bachmann would have a hard time winning Utah.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 03, 2013, 03:14:33 AM »

Bachmann probably only wins the most conservative states. Hillary gets around 500 EV's.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,170
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 03, 2013, 09:17:55 AM »

Bachmann would probably be able to win MS, AL, OK, and maybe UT, but Clinton would have a good chance of sweeping.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,268
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 03, 2013, 01:38:04 PM »


Ever notice how after being fawned over during the 2010 elections, Brian Sandoval and Susana Martinez are more or less ignored by their party and by everyone else? They were supposed to put a less pale face on the Tea Party in the same way Marco Rubio was (though he's pretty pale himself) and instead they've governed as moderates who largely avoid the national spotlight (or are avoided by the national spotlight).
Logged
emcee0
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 535
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 03, 2013, 05:47:56 PM »

Michelle would probably still sweep every county in Oklahoma.. ahaha
Logged
emcee0
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 535
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 03, 2013, 05:50:08 PM »

Imagine Hillary shadowing Reagan with a 49 state win.. Christmas 2016 they ask the President- elect what she would like for Christmas and her response is.. Well.. Oklahoma would have been nice Smiley
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 03, 2013, 06:09:22 PM »


Ever notice how after being fawned over during the 2010 elections, Brian Sandoval and Susana Martinez are more or less ignored by their party and by everyone else? They were supposed to put a less pale face on the Tea Party in the same way Marco Rubio was (though he's pretty pale himself) and instead they've governed as moderates who largely avoid the national spotlight (or are avoided by the national spotlight).
I'm certainly not ignoring Susana, and I know Hagrid and A-Bob aren't either! Smiley She has a pretty strong base for 2016 on the forum. Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 13 queries.