Most vulnerable incumbent Senator in 2014?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:03:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Most vulnerable incumbent Senator in 2014?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Mark Begich (AK)
#2
Mark Pryor (AR)
#3
Brian Schatz (HI)
#4
Mitch McConnell (KY)
#5
Mary Landrieu (LA)
#6
Kay Hagan (NC)
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Author Topic: Most vulnerable incumbent Senator in 2014?  (Read 1063 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 06, 2013, 11:42:06 AM »
IMO, easily Mark Pryor.
Logged
nolesfan2011
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,411
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.68, S: -7.48

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2013, 11:42:25 AM »
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,148
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2013, 11:43:32 AM »
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,541
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2013, 11:44:23 AM »
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2013, 12:36:54 PM »
Cotton seems like the right kind of Republican for Arkansas, so it looks like Pryor could be needing a new job.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2013, 01:26:25 PM »
Surely Pryor.
Logged
H. Ross Peron
General Mung Beans
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,407
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2013, 01:41:17 PM »
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2013, 01:41:49 PM »
Logged
Njall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,021
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2013, 06:55:14 PM »
Logged
RedSLC
SLValleyMan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,484
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2013, 07:46:39 PM »
Mark Pryor, especially considering Arkansas' recent trends.
Logged
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2013, 10:00:36 PM »
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2013, 10:03:36 PM »
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2013, 10:10:56 PM »
Mark Pryor, though I expect Brian Schatz to have a tough time as well.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 07, 2013, 12:09:21 AM »
1 Mark Pryor
2 Tim Johnson
3 Mary Landrieu 
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 07, 2013, 01:05:51 AM »

Quote from: barfbag on July 07, 2013, 12:09:21 AM
1 Mark Pryor
2 Tim Johnson
3 Mary Landrieu 

Johnson can't be vulnerable as such as he's not running for reelection.
Logged
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 07, 2013, 01:27:00 AM »
Oh I didn't know that.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 07, 2013, 01:54:14 AM »
In order:

1. Pryor (nearing Lincoln levels)
2. Schatz (looking down and out right now but primaries are rather unpredictable, safe in the GE if he gets there obv.)
3. Begich (a good candidate, but is in a very red and is up against a strong candidate)
4. Landrieu (ditto)
5. Hagan (should be vulnerable but she doesn't have a good opponent)
6. McConnell (should be vulnerable but is in a friendly state and has a major fundraising base)
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,515
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2013, 10:02:16 AM »
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2013, 10:39:01 AM »
I'll go out on a limb and say Begich, followed by McConnell.
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,803
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 07, 2013, 10:07:52 PM »
1. Mark Pryor
2. Mitch McConnell
3. Mary Landrieu
4. Mark  Begich (Only if Joe Miller gets the Republican nomination)
5. Kay Hagan
6. Brian Schatz
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 07, 2013, 10:29:50 PM »
I voted Begich, but reading the rest of the comments, I changed my vote to Pryor. I was unaware he was in that much trouble and I have not really followed his race.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 07, 2013, 10:43:14 PM »
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on July 07, 2013, 10:29:50 PM
I voted Begich, but reading the rest of the comments, I changed my vote to Pryor. I was unaware he was in that much trouble and I have not really followed his race.

Considering its Alaska he should be in more trouble than he's in, but right now the Alaska Party is in shambles. Still, Mead could be self-funding. But honestly, I think Republicans should back away, Begich is one of the better Senators.
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 07, 2013, 10:48:41 PM »
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on July 07, 2013, 10:29:50 PM
I voted Begich, but reading the rest of the comments, I changed my vote to Pryor. I was unaware he was in that much trouble and I have not really followed his race.
Right now, people are pissed at him.  he is at about 40% in polls right now, which given his name rec, is horrible.  His approval rating is bad too.  30% approval/disapproval, just bad.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 08, 2013, 01:04:11 AM »

I'm not that familiar with Arkansas politics, so what the hell did Pryor do to approach Lincoln's territory and less than six years after running basically unopossed?
Logged
JerryArkansas
jerryarkansas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 08, 2013, 06:41:27 AM »
Quote from: Ferdie the Indestructible on July 08, 2013, 01:04:11 AM

I'm not that familiar with Arkansas politics, so what the hell did Pryor do to approach Lincoln's territory and less than six years after running basically unopposed?
Being a Dem who is being portrayed as close to Obama.  Health Care vote, and other things have hurt him bad.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.069 seconds with 15 queries.