http://www.startribune.com/business/215881221.htmlWhile Keystone XL has become a thing in the national consciousness, the focus on that one pipeline has meant that other pipelines are being expanded under the radar with hardly a wimper from environmentalists.
The Enbridge "Alberta Clipper" pipeline that was laid down across northern Minnesota in the heart of the economic downturn (2009 to early 2010), brought a very much needed injection of cash as hundreds of workers around the country moved in.
Now they'll expand pumping stations to increase the capacity of the pipeline by 27%.
Here's the one simple reason I support the pipeline: It is so much safer than transporting the oil by rail. Already because the pipelines from the Bakken oil patch are at capacity, the number of oil tanker cars riding the rails through Minnesota has mushroomed from 9500 in 2008 to 380,000 in 2012 and will likely reach 600,000 soon.
Already a derailment led to an oil spill in western Minnesota last fall.
Opposing the pipeline knowing that the alternative is moving the oil on rails is short sighted and potentially damaging to the environment.
The truth, unfortunate or not, is that this oil will continue to be used. Let's be reasonable and make the process of transporting the oil as safe as possible. And continue to fight for increased fuel efficiency standards, electricity standards, and an overall reduction in oil use even as the proportion of our oil coming from stable regions increases.
Better our oil than Iraq's or Saudi Arabia's.
The well-meaning environmental movement that is actually causing more damage to the environment by exporting pollution to nations with lax pollution standards should be discouraged.