Clinton/Buchanan/Perot 1992 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:44:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Clinton/Buchanan/Perot 1992 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton/Buchanan/Perot 1992  (Read 5803 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« on: April 04, 2004, 01:14:08 PM »

Buchanan would come in third. He'd carry the southern states Clinton lost, Perot would carry most of the west, and Clinton would win everything else.

Agreed...plus Utah for Pat.  perot would have won Maine.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2004, 07:03:43 PM »

Buchanan would come in third. He'd carry the southern states Clinton lost, Perot would carry most of the west, and Clinton would win everything else.

Agreed...plus Utah for Pat.  perot would have won Maine.

I've often wondered why so much of Maine was behind Perot. What was the deal with that?

The Northeast likes independents.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.