Clinton/Buchanan/Perot 1992 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:19:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Clinton/Buchanan/Perot 1992 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton/Buchanan/Perot 1992  (Read 5801 times)
Kodratos
Ataturk
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 781


« on: April 04, 2004, 05:10:17 PM »

Buchanan would come in third. He'd carry the southern states Clinton lost, Perot would carry most of the west, and Clinton would win everything else.

Agreed...plus Utah for Pat.  perot would have won Maine.

I've often wondered why so much of Maine was behind Perot. What was the deal with that?
Logged
Kodratos
Ataturk
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 781


« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2004, 05:34:42 PM »

Maine, like Minnesota has a strong third party/independent tradition. They recentely had a two-term independent governor, and in their latest governor's race, the Green got over 9%. They also elected a Green State Senator.

I know they are very independent. I am originally from Maine. But Perot?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.