Was Alexander Haig the 'de facto' President in 1974?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:28:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Was Alexander Haig the 'de facto' President in 1974?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Was Alexander Haig the 'de facto' President in 1974?  (Read 583 times)
DevotedDemocrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 442
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: 0.02

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 21, 2013, 03:09:30 PM »

I've read at times, after the resignations of Haldeman and Ehlichman in April 1973, and with the Watergate Scandal increasingly consuming both his time and credibility, President Nixon began to actually lose his power as President, and that de facto control of the country fell to Alexander Haig (in terms of domestic policy) and Henry Kissinger (in terms of foreign policy) in the last six months or so of his Presidency--around the Spring/Summer of 1974.

I've read some accounts that go so far as to paint Haig as the "de facto" President in the last months of Nixon's term.

How true is this?
If so, when did Nixon's grip on power become so weak that Haig and Kissinger began to run the country for him--at what point can we pin point it?

If not, was Nixon still in command, in control, in the last months (say beginning January 1974)?

And why, in most accounts, are the resignations of Haldeman and Ehlichman portrayed as being incredibly devastating to Nixon's Presidency?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.204 seconds with 13 queries.