2009 Obama Stimulus Package
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 06:51:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  2009 Obama Stimulus Package
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2009 Obama Stimulus Package  (Read 942 times)
barfbag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,611
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.26, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 23, 2013, 03:26:28 PM »

How did you feel about it when it passed? Has it worked?

I didn't like it at first, but it seems to have worked.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,133
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2013, 03:34:25 PM »

It should have been much, MUCH bigger, but still better than nothing.
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,334
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2013, 04:05:36 PM »

It should have been much, MUCH bigger, but still better than nothing.

Yup, this.
Logged
H. Ross Peron
General Mung Beans
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,407
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2013, 05:10:42 PM »

It should have been much, MUCH bigger, but still better than nothing.

This. It should have included a provision for a national high speed rail system and the construction of dozens of new nuclear power plants to move American away from fossil fuels.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,566
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2013, 06:48:39 PM »

It worked in terms of helping to save the economy from another Great Depression (in conjunction with the TARP bank bailouts passed earlier).  And to echo what everyone else said, it is a shame it wasn't bigger, with more emphasis on infrastructure as opposed to tax cuts. 
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2013, 06:01:35 AM »

Too loaded down with tax cuts. Needed more spending, but otherwise better than nothing.
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,244
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2013, 06:00:50 AM »

Too loaded down with tax cuts. Needed more spending, but otherwise better than nothing.

^This. Christina Romer's original $1.8 trillion stimulus plan would have been much better. If there was ever a more urgent time to go big and ambitious, it was then. The President had considerable capital and big majorities in Congress at the time. Unfortunately, too many were in positions of importance that didn't value what a robust stimulus would do for the economy.
Logged
tik 🪀✨
ComradeCarter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,496
Australia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2013, 07:16:20 AM »

Too loaded down with tax cuts. Needed more spending, but otherwise better than nothing.

^This. Christina Romer's original $1.8 trillion stimulus plan would have been much better. If there was ever a more urgent time to go big and ambitious, it was then. The President had considerable capital and big majorities in Congress at the time. Unfortunately, too many were in positions of importance that didn't value what a robust stimulus would do for the economy.

I adore the idea of massive government projects to improve infrastructure, and I do think it would have made some impact if we had done high speed rail, built nuclear plants, or a number of other things.

Nevertheless I don't feel like it would have improved the economy that much more. Sure, there are lots and lots of jobs that these large-scale projects would create in the short term. But enough to cut into the devastation much more in the immediate than what was done? I'm not too sure. Again, I would have loved to see these big ideas go forward, but I'm not sure they'd have made a big difference.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 12 queries.