Cook County makes up most up most of Illinois population growth in 2012 Census.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:54:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Cook County makes up most up most of Illinois population growth in 2012 Census.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Cook County makes up most up most of Illinois population growth in 2012 Census.  (Read 802 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 25, 2013, 08:42:57 PM »

Illinois grew by 44,600 people so far this decade while Cook County grew by around 36,700 people. That's a reversal from the 2010 Census when Kendall County grew by 110% by 60,300 people to 114,736 people and Cook lost around 182,000 people. So far Kendall has grown by 3,400 people in the 2012 Census up to 118,105 people.

Cook County:
2000 Census: 5,376,741
2010 Census: 5,194,675
2012 Census: 5,231,351

Population High

1970 Census: 5,492,369

Population Low:

1990 Census: 5,105,067

source: wikipedia
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2013, 09:25:51 PM »

Of course in terms of rate Kendall is growing 4 times faster than Cook. Smiley
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,309


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2013, 09:28:45 PM »

I think that is a deceiving way of putting it. There are a lot of rural counties that are losing population, and Cook is counterbalancing that. There is also a lot of growth going on in suburban Chicago, mostly at higher rates, except for maybe Lake?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2013, 04:56:03 AM »

The 2012 census?
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2013, 01:11:35 PM »

Well Census estimates.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2013, 01:12:24 PM »

Not really surprising, given that there's really no reason to live anywhere else in Illinois outside Chicagoland.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2013, 01:13:01 PM »

I think that is a deceiving way of putting it. There are a lot of rural counties that are losing population, and Cook is counterbalancing that. There is also a lot of growth going on in suburban Chicago, mostly at higher rates, except for maybe Lake?
Yeah Lake has lost 300 people when comparing the 2010 Census to 2012 Census estimates.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2013, 02:01:29 PM »

Not really surprising, given that there's really no reason to live anywhere else in Illinois outside Chicagoland.
Well Kendall is outside Chicagoland.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2013, 02:44:12 PM »

Not really surprising, given that there's really no reason to live anywhere else in Illinois outside Chicagoland.
Well Kendall is outside Chicagoland.

Not really.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2013, 07:02:38 AM »

Not really surprising, given that there's really no reason to live anywhere else in Illinois outside Chicagoland.
Well Kendall is outside Chicagoland.

Kendall is very much part of Chicagoland. The growth in the 2000's was largely for bedroom communities serving job centers in Aurora, Naperville, Downers Grove and Oak Brook - basically southern DuPage and Kane counties. As the effects of the Great Recession on housing are abating, that growth is starting up again.

The estimated Chicago growth is primarily in redeveloping neighborhoods adjacent to the Loop and an influx in immigrant areas. If this estimate is like the ones in the 2000's then it will have underestimated the population loss from traditional black and white ethnic neighborhoods. It wouldn't surprise me if the net Chicago growth was overestimated.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 13 queries.