Schweitzer / Warner 2008?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 07:20:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Schweitzer / Warner 2008?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Schweitzer / Warner 2008?  (Read 6606 times)
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 14, 2005, 07:26:40 PM »

The left would hate him, so he can't get the nomination in the first place.

Why?

They wouldn't like his views on gun control. And his red state image in general wouldn't go over too well with "latte liberals".
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 14, 2005, 07:29:39 PM »


They wouldn't like his views on gun control. And his red state image in general wouldn't go over too well with "latte liberals".

What about this guy?



and his A rating from the NRA?
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 14, 2005, 07:31:27 PM »

So far the left is extremley satisfied with Schweitzer.  He has openly opposed Bush's SS plan and he wants the Montana National Guard out of Iraq and home for the wildfire season.  But I see where your comming from.  One wrong move and he will be on their sh**t list.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 14, 2005, 07:32:12 PM »


They wouldn't like his views on gun control. And his red state image in general wouldn't go over too well with "latte liberals".

What about this guy?



and his A rating from the NRA?

No one in the primaries cared about gun control, because of his opposition to the war. And he's from Vermont, which basically inoculated him against charges of not being liberal enough.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,736


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 14, 2005, 07:35:51 PM »


They wouldn't like his views on gun control. And his red state image in general wouldn't go over too well with "latte liberals".

What about this guy?



and his A rating from the NRA?

No one in the primaries cared about gun control, because of his opposition to the war. And he's from Vermont, which basically inoculated him against charges of not being liberal enough.

If gun control was an important issue, it would have come up in the primary. Vermont currently has a Republican governor. I think Dean had the least radical health care plan out of all of the Democrats.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 14, 2005, 08:18:38 PM »

The Left would turn on Schwietzer. That's not even a question.

Probably Warner too.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 14, 2005, 08:19:23 PM »

The Left would turn on Schwietzer. That's not even a question.

Probably Warner too.


I agree w/ that statement.  If he did one thing wrong he would go from a favorite straigh to the sh**t list.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,736


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 14, 2005, 09:19:29 PM »

The Left would turn on Schwietzer. That's not even a question.

Probably Warner too.


I agree w/ that statement.  If he did one thing wrong he would go from a favorite straigh to the sh**t list.

Oh come on, Kerry did some wrong things, and still got 59,028,548 votes.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 14, 2005, 09:21:17 PM »

The Left would turn on Schwietzer. That's not even a question.

Probably Warner too.


I agree w/ that statement.  If he did one thing wrong he would go from a favorite straigh to the sh**t list.

Oh come on, Kerry did some wrong things, and still got 59,028,548 votes.

Kerry was a true liberal though.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,736


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: March 14, 2005, 09:22:41 PM »
« Edited: March 14, 2005, 09:24:41 PM by jfern »


Kerry was a true liberal though.

There are about 20 Senators more liberal than him. He voted for this stupid war.  That was a really dumb move on his part. He would have been much more effective at criticizing going to war if he had clearly opposed it.
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: March 14, 2005, 10:44:37 PM »

Generally, I don't like social conservatives as candidates, but I would vote for Schweitzer
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,736


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: March 15, 2005, 12:31:31 AM »

Generally, I don't like social conservatives as candidates, but I would vote for Schweitzer

These are the positions I found for social issues.

He's anti gun control.
He's pro-choice.
He opposes vouchers.
He's against the constituonal amendment to ban gay marriage, but says that Montana should ban both gay marriages and civil unions. If you ignore his opinion on Montana, that's the same position as Kerry.

He's moderate socially.
Logged
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,083


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: March 16, 2005, 01:57:20 AM »

Generally, I don't like social conservatives as candidates, but I would vote for Schweitzer

These are the positions I found for social issues.

He's anti gun control.
He's pro-choice.
He opposes vouchers.
He's against the constituonal amendment to ban gay marriage, but says that Montana should ban both gay marriages and civil unions. If you ignore his opinion on Montana, that's the same position as Kerry.

He's moderate socially.

I thought Kerry favored civil unions
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,736


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: March 16, 2005, 03:34:31 AM »

Generally, I don't like social conservatives as candidates, but I would vote for Schweitzer

These are the positions I found for social issues.

He's anti gun control.
He's pro-choice.
He opposes vouchers.
He's against the constituonal amendment to ban gay marriage, but says that Montana should ban both gay marriages and civil unions. If you ignore his opinion on Montana, that's the same position as Kerry.

He's moderate socially.

I thought Kerry favored civil unions

Schweitzer opposes the gay marriage ban amendment, so Kerry and his positions are the same on the federal level.

Interestingly, Bush said he's for civil unions, so he's more socially liberal than Schweitzer there, even though he's more socially conservative than Schweitzer on the amendment.
Logged
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,083


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: March 16, 2005, 05:02:29 PM »

ok, i see what you're saying

ironically enough I probably find myself most in agreement with Kerry on the issue.  Probably not too many issues I can say that about.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 12 queries.