54'40
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2024, 08:55:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  54'40
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 54'40  (Read 6709 times)
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 12, 2005, 09:24:07 PM »

What if B.C. was allowed to become a state and 54'40 was agreed to?

How would B.C. play out in US elections.
Logged
Redefeatbush04
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,504


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2005, 11:00:36 PM »

What if B.C. was allowed to become a state and 54'40 was agreed to?

How would B.C. play out in US elections.

what exactly is 54'40?
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2005, 11:14:50 PM »
« Edited: March 12, 2005, 11:16:23 PM by Jesus »

What if B.C. was allowed to become a state and 54'40 was agreed to?

How would B.C. play out in US elections.

what exactly is 54'40?

54'40 or fight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Polk like, ran on a campaign of taking all of Oregon Country (WA,OR,BC, plus a bit of ID, MT)



or something.

BC would be democrat.  i realize that it would be more conservative had it been American for 150+ years, but most of the population lives in the Vancouver area, not to mention Victoria, so like Washington and Oregon it would still be Democrat.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2005, 12:08:49 AM »

I'm not sure what it'd be like if it was there from the get-go, but today it would be solid Democrat.  The only reason it seems so conservative is because of massive vote-splitting.  My Conservative MP won re-election with only 34% (!) of the vote.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2005, 12:20:27 PM »

I'm not sure what it'd be like if it was there from the get-go, but today it would be solid Democrat.  The only reason it seems so conservative is because of massive vote-splitting.  My Conservative MP won re-election with only 34% (!) of the vote.

Did two liberals split the vote badly or what?
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2005, 05:16:14 PM »
« Edited: March 14, 2005, 05:20:47 PM by Senator Gabu, PPT »

I'm not sure what it'd be like if it was there from the get-go, but today it would be solid Democrat.  The only reason it seems so conservative is because of massive vote-splitting.  My Conservative MP won re-election with only 34% (!) of the vote.

Did two liberals split the vote badly or what?

Three, actually.  There was David Mulroney, the Liberal Party candidate, Jennifer Burgis, the NDP candidate, and Andrew Lewis, the Green Party Candidate.  All together, the three of them amassed 65% of the vote, but among them the vote was split 27% - 21% - 17%, respectively, which resulted in Gary Lunn being re-elected even though nearly 2/3 of the population voted for someone else.

Looking through the election results in BC, there are actually only 4 candidates out of 36 who were elected with a majority of the vote.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2005, 05:36:49 PM »

I'm not sure what it'd be like if it was there from the get-go, but today it would be solid Democrat.  The only reason it seems so conservative is because of massive vote-splitting.  My Conservative MP won re-election with only 34% (!) of the vote.

Did two liberals split the vote badly or what?

Three, actually.  There was David Mulroney, the Liberal Party candidate, Jennifer Burgis, the NDP candidate, and Andrew Lewis, the Green Party Candidate.  All together, the three of them amassed 65% of the vote, but among them the vote was split 27% - 21% - 17%, respectively, which resulted in Gary Lunn being re-elected even though nearly 2/3 of the population voted for someone else.

Looking through the election results in BC, there are actually only 4 candidates out of 36 who were elected with a majority of the vote.

That's why countries like yours need a run-off to decide elections, or going even further, Instant Run-off Voting.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,700


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2005, 05:59:51 PM »



That's why countries like yours need a run-off to decide elections, or going even further, Instant Run-off Voting.

Or even better, Ranked Pairs voting.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 14, 2005, 06:09:38 PM »

I'm not sure what it'd be like if it was there from the get-go, but today it would be solid Democrat.  The only reason it seems so conservative is because of massive vote-splitting.  My Conservative MP won re-election with only 34% (!) of the vote.

Did two liberals split the vote badly or what?

Three, actually.  There was David Mulroney, the Liberal Party candidate, Jennifer Burgis, the NDP candidate, and Andrew Lewis, the Green Party Candidate.  All together, the three of them amassed 65% of the vote, but among them the vote was split 27% - 21% - 17%, respectively, which resulted in Gary Lunn being re-elected even though nearly 2/3 of the population voted for someone else.

Looking through the election results in BC, there are actually only 4 candidates out of 36 who were elected with a majority of the vote.

That's why countries like yours need a run-off to decide elections, or going even further, Instant Run-off Voting.

There actually is a proposition on the ballot in the upcoming provincial election to establish a form of instant run-off voting as the election method for BC.  I plan to vote yes on it, for the above reason.
Logged
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,083


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2005, 06:01:32 PM »

While I was in college I took a class where we went to Victoria and spoke with MPs and stuff.  What struck me was that the "Conservatives" sounded more like our Democrats and the NDPs would have been totally unelectable in even my liberal native state of Oregon.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,700


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2005, 04:40:34 PM »

While I was in college I took a class where we went to Victoria and spoke with MPs and stuff.  What struck me was that the "Conservatives" sounded more like our Democrats and the NDPs would have been totally unelectable in even my liberal native state of Oregon.

That's why it's so ridiculous that some people want the Democratic party to move to the right. Compared to other countries, the Democratic party is right-wing already.
Logged
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,083


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2005, 06:13:51 PM »

That's because, compared to other countries the United States is right winged!
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2005, 06:19:33 PM »

The participative electorate is center-right.

America as a whole isn't.

But if you don't participate in the voting process, your point of view is considered moot.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 13, 2005, 12:57:36 AM »

But if you don't participate in the voting process, your point of view is considered moot.

It seems to me that the fact that nearly 50% of the electorate doesn't vote is the fault of that 50%, not of the politicians.  It doesn't do the politicians any good to care about someone who isn't going to vote one way or another.
Logged
Serenity Now
tomm_86
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,174
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2005, 05:38:03 PM »

That's because, compared to other countries the United States is right winged!

So... every other industrialised/Western country is Left-winged?
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 19, 2005, 11:12:33 PM »

There actually is a proposition on the ballot in the upcoming provincial election to establish a form of instant run-off voting as the election method for BC.  I plan to vote yes on it, for the above reason.

So, what happened, Gabu? Grin
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 19, 2005, 11:18:06 PM »

There actually is a proposition on the ballot in the upcoming provincial election to establish a form of instant run-off voting as the election method for BC.  I plan to vote yes on it, for the above reason.

So, what happened, Gabu? Grin

Mostly that I found out that it only applied to provincial elections.  That and I read other articles that highlighted negatives that I hadn't thought of.
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 19, 2005, 11:19:13 PM »

There actually is a proposition on the ballot in the upcoming provincial election to establish a form of instant run-off voting as the election method for BC.  I plan to vote yes on it, for the above reason.

So, what happened, Gabu? Grin

Mostly that I found out that it only applied to provincial elections.

Not as much fun as expected, eh? Perhaps they couldn't, legally, apply it to Canadian federal elections? Huh
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 19, 2005, 11:20:29 PM »

Not as much fun as expected, eh? Perhaps they couldn't, legally, apply it to Canadian federal elections? Huh

I would imagine that it probably wouldn't be fair and certainly wouldn't be legal to allow each province to decide how to elect its representatives, after thinking about it.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,997
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 19, 2005, 11:30:51 PM »

There actually is a proposition on the ballot in the upcoming provincial election to establish a form of instant run-off voting as the election method for BC.  I plan to vote yes on it, for the above reason.

So, what happened, Gabu? Grin

Mostly that I found out that it only applied to provincial elections.  That and I read other articles that highlighted negatives that I hadn't thought of.

What made you think it would be for federal elections?
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 19, 2005, 11:32:14 PM »

Not as much fun as expected, eh? Perhaps they couldn't, legally, apply it to Canadian federal elections? Huh

I would imagine that it probably wouldn't be fair and certainly wouldn't be legal to allow each province to decide how to elect its representatives, after thinking about it.

Although that is exactly the situation in the U.S., subject to certain federal laws. If certain standards were followed to ensure no one was disenfranchised, it would probably work out okay.
Logged
M
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 18, 2005, 10:33:43 AM »

That's because, compared to other countries the United States is right winged!

So... every other industrialised/Western country is Left-winged?

Comparatively, with the notable exceptions of Israel and prehaps Japan.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 29, 2005, 03:55:25 PM »

That's because, compared to other countries the United States is right winged!

So... every other industrialised/Western country is Left-winged?

Comparatively, with the notable exceptions of Israel and prehaps Japan.

And maybe Australia, too.
Logged
M
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 01, 2005, 11:46:09 PM »

Australia does have a powerful right wing that is in some ways similar to the American. But on the whole, Australia is probably not more or equally right wing, but more like a little to the left.

Another potential candidate: Taiwan.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 12 queries.